Welcome Guest

Pretty much as a retaliation for the Senate not doing its

Posted on: January 29, 2025 at 09:22:06 CT
SparkyStalcup MU
Posts:
24637
Member For:
13.24 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
job and confirming Garland (or at least holding hearings and a vote). SCOTUS should be at worst a 5-4 split right now.

Really what I don't want to see is one side of the aisle have a stronghold on the court for over 50 years (or basically 140 of the last 160 years), as we have currently. Courts should turn over more frequently, and justices would be less partisan if that happened. I'm not saying we should elect SCOTUS (that would create more problems than it would solve), but maybe 12 year terms with a third of the justices rotating off every 4 years
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Are you cool if we add 8 seats in 2029? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/29 08:11:10
          you gunna answer?(nm) - CulturedDan MU - 1/29 08:21:45
               He basically has - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 08:30:22
                    No principles at all(nm) - Wildcat KSU - 1/29 09:12:27
                    I'd prefer term limits, personally, since these are unelecte - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/29 08:32:51
                         You didn't state that before - you wanted more justices - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 08:37:11
                         You wanted 4 more justices added if the dems - Bosalphus KC - 1/29 08:34:53
          So what you essentially saying is you don't think - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 08:18:44
               The court should probably go to about 19-27 seats - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/29 08:46:27
                    why did you lower the initial add to just 2 seats?(nm) - CulturedDan MU - 1/29 08:50:10
                    So why did you like the idea of adding 4 Justices not that - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 08:49:27
                         Pretty much as a retaliation for the Senate not doing its - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/29 09:22:06
                              So you are fine with short term retaliation if it suits you - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 09:45:43
                              I think Cocaine Mitch has been proven to be justified - CulturedDan MU - 1/29 09:24:13
                              Their duty is to confirm a guy named Garland? (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 1/29 09:23:55
                                   Their duty is to advise and consent. They did neither with - SparkyStalcup MU - 1/29 09:30:09
                                        They didn't have to with him (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 1/29 09:34:48
                         Just so we view his thoughts in the right lense - CulturedDan MU - 1/29 09:03:26
                         He's also gone from term limits to now adding - Bosalphus KC - 1/29 08:50:21
                              Well, they are all fairly similar in concept - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 08:52:32
                    Should Trump add 4 seats then? (nm) - Bosalphus KC - 1/29 08:48:26
          No. Are you for adding 4 this year like you - Bosalphus KC - 1/29 08:16:38
          So your answer is...? You don't argue based on principle, - hokie VT - 1/29 08:14:56
     I have been clear on my commiment to giving dems some wins - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 08:10:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard