Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No. It is challenging a bad SCOTUS decision

Posted on: January 20, 2025 at 18:47:06 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144683
Member For:
20.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and forcing them to revisit the wrong headed US v. Wong Kim Ark.

Sort of like how SCOTUS overturned Roe v Wade, Hammer v. Dagenhart, Betts v. Brady, Bowers v. Hardwick, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Baker v. Nelson and Plessy v. Ferguson
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Trump to end birthright citizenship for children of illegals - Spanky KU - 1/20 18:01:49
     If DJT offers ACB and family 100% protection it will pass - tigertix MU - 1/20 18:26:31
     Makes way too much sense, which means it won’t last. (nm) - Outsider MU - 1/20 18:06:04
     Amending the Constitution by executive order - *M* KC - 1/20 18:05:46
          no it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/20 19:06:14
          That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging - Spanky KU - 1/20 18:18:04
               RE: That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging - *M* KC - 1/20 18:35:25
                    No. It is challenging a bad SCOTUS decision - Spanky KU - 1/20 18:47:06
     Make it retroactive to 1945(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/20 18:03:54




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard