Welcome Guest

That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging

Posted on: January 20, 2025 at 18:18:04 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144681
Member For:
20.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
a dumb SCOTUS ruling that took place in 30 years AFTER the 14th Amendment was ratified and ...

It also directly contradicted The Supreme Court's 1873 Slaughterhouse Cases that ruled the 14th Amendment's "phrase, 'subject to its jurisdiction,' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within the United States."
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     If DJT offers ACB and family 100% protection it will pass - tigertix MU - 1/20 18:26:31
     Makes way too much sense, which means it won’t last. (nm) - Outsider MU - 1/20 18:06:04
     Amending the Constitution by executive order - *M* KC - 1/20 18:05:46
          no it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/20 19:06:14
          That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging - Spanky KU - 1/20 18:18:04
               RE: That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging - *M* KC - 1/20 18:35:25
                    No. It is challenging a bad SCOTUS decision - Spanky KU - 1/20 18:47:06
     Make it retroactive to 1945(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/20 18:03:54




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard