Welcome Guest

RE: That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging

Posted on: January 20, 2025 at 18:35:25 CT
*M* KC
Posts:
31544
Member For:
23.91 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It is effectively attempting to amend the constitution by EO.

And your citation to discredited dicta from the Slaughterhouse Cases is not close to persuasive.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     If DJT offers ACB and family 100% protection it will pass - tigertix MU - 1/20 18:26:31
     Makes way too much sense, which means it won’t last. (nm) - Outsider MU - 1/20 18:06:04
     Amending the Constitution by executive order - *M* KC - 1/20 18:05:46
          no it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/20 19:06:14
          That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging - Spanky KU - 1/20 18:18:04
               RE: That is NOT amending the Constitution. It is challenging - *M* KC - 1/20 18:35:25
                    No. It is challenging a bad SCOTUS decision - Spanky KU - 1/20 18:47:06
     Make it retroactive to 1945(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 1/20 18:03:54




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard