Welcome Guest

Follow up to breaking the NCAA thread earlier

Posted on: September 5, 2024 at 16:50:20 CT
alwaysright MU
Posts:
49692
Member For:
17.37 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Out of curiosity, I've been looking at some numbers lately if there were to be a split for the top programs to make a new model for college football...could easily be expanded to all sports.

I looked at three factors for Power level programs:
All time wins
All time win %
Win percentage this century

First found the top 56 Power schools from both all time categories. Then counted to see how many of them also appeared in the top 56 of the 21st century list. Interestingly, there are 48...which has been a common number thrown out for a "superleague".
For the most part, it is exactly who you think it would be.

The 48 broken down into 6 geographical groups of 8.

West - UW-Oregon-Cal-Stanford-UCLA-USC-BYU-Utah

Plains - Nub-OK-OKSt-Texas-A&M-TTech-TCU-Baylor

Valley - Minny-Wisc-Iowa-Mizzou-Ark-OleMiss-MissSt-LSU

Northeast - BC-PennSt-Pitt-OhioSt-Mich-MichSt-ND-Purdue

South - Bama-Auburn-UGA-GaTech-Kentucky-Tenn-WVU-SCar

East - Miami-Florida-FSU-Clemson-UNC-NCSt-VaTech-Maryland



My personal preference for college football would be to go backwards. More STUDENT-athlete. No playoff. More traditional conferences. Traditional bowl tie-ins. And a plus-1 model that was all we really needed 35 years ago. Some level of agreement where money is more evenly distributed would be needed, but there are ways.

I also realize that is never happening in my lifetime, and since we're moving so drastically far away from what the sport was, I could live with pro-style league, divisions, playoff based on the above. Your division becomes your conference and winning it still has a significant matter of pride.

Everybody plays a FCS Labor Day weekend but it doesn't count for records or schedule.

7 divisions games.
4 non-division games of your choosing...keep rivalries alive here.

Division winners and 2 wildcards are in playoff.

Remaining second and third place teams (maybe even 4th place teams) go to bowl games.

Universal revenue sharing like the NFL would still be a pretty important issue here.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Follow up to breaking the NCAA thread earlier - alwaysright MU - 9/5 16:50:20
     I agree with you - Genco98 MU - 9/6 12:44:42
     so you want to go back to student athletes - meatiger MU - 9/6 01:06:42
     probably needs to be 64 - the west is under represented - tigerinhogtown STL - 9/5 17:37:01
          56. this is kind of a sweet spot imo. - alwaysright MU - 9/5 18:12:48
               But it still has kansas(nm) - JeffB MU - 9/5 20:56:26
                    VERY borderline and could be swapped out - alwaysright MU - 9/5 22:00:23
          64 - alwaysright MU - 9/5 18:09:08
               'No way that non-Power conference teams get in. No SDSU, - JeffB MU - 9/5 20:54:56
                    If this were to happen, it would be the SEC & BIG hand - alwaysright MU - 9/5 22:03:26
                         and it seems to make sense for them, assuming that the - JeffB MU - 9/5 22:09:28
          If their is some sort of labor agreement - meatiger MU - 9/6 01:07:30
               RE: If their is some sort of labor agreement - wtk UT - 9/6 09:47:02
          I looks like it would take cutting to 40 teams for the - alwaysright MU - 9/5 17:31:55
               BYU and WVU, would go before UNC and Kentucky...nm - tigertix MU - 9/5 17:37:27
                    There would certainly be financial value/resources - alwaysright MU - 9/5 18:06:40




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard