 |
|
RE: Thanks for the thoughtful & on point replies. Followup...
Posted on: June 2, 2024 at 13:52:16 CT
JG MU
Posts:
250566
Member For:
20.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
1) I'd say its pretty unusual but not from any personal experience or knowledge
2)
https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2021/eln/article-17/17-152/
seems pretty vague, but I don't make the laws (seems to me that its probably not used near enough)
I'm not a tax expert but my guess is that if trump had paid it out himself- it would have been deductible.
Since it was a reimbursement - it was more a loan repayment and not? not sure
the campaign finance law had to do with the limit. 130k was above the limit he could do, but I don't have the exact law at hand
followup answers
1) they were in the indictment so its not like they were a mystery
2) the legal expert was going to testify about his interpretation of the law and nothing else. The judge correctly declared that is the duty of the judge
2)
https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2021/eln/article-17/17-152/
seems pretty vague, but I don't make the laws (seems to me that its probably not used near enough)
I'm not a tax expert but my guess is that if trump had paid it out himself- it would have been deductible.
Since it was a reimbursement - it was more a loan repayment and not? not sure
the campaign finance law had to do with the limit. 130k was above the limit he could do, but I don't have the exact law at hand
followup answers
1) they were in the indictment so its not like they were a mystery
2) the legal expert was going to testify about his interpretation of the law and nothing else. The judge correctly declared that is the duty of the judge
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
RE: Thanks for the thoughtful & on point replies. Followup... - JG MU - 6/2 13:52:16