Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: It would have served you better: It seems the Supreme

Posted on: March 5, 2024 at 10:41:40 CT
BH O'bonga MU
Posts:
26503
Member For:
5.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Court by a 9 - 0 decision sides with my interpretation of the 14th Amdt. Let's see. Do I agree with the nine Justices or do I switch sides and go along with an anonymous TB poster who styles himself a Libertarian liberal. Hmmmmm, its a very tough call!
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

If SCOTUS didn't "get it right" and kept Trump off some - ummmm MU - 3/5 09:14:32
     no(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/5 09:16:26
          Why does Colorado's supreme court not receive that deference - ummmm MU - 3/5 09:17:06
               RE: Why does Colorado's supreme court not receive that deference - BH O'bonga MU - 3/5 09:29:10
                    You don't even know what the 14th Amendment says - ummmm MU - 3/5 09:37:44
                         and it also says CONGRESS can enforce SECTION 3. - blake1771 MU - 3/5 10:12:14
                         RE: You don't even know what the 14th Amendment says - BH O'bonga MU - 3/5 09:59:48
                              It would have served you better to do a copy and paste. - ummmm MU - 3/5 10:06:10
                                   RE: It would have served you better: It seems the Supreme - BH O'bonga MU - 3/5 10:41:40
                                        RE: It would have served you better: It seems the Supreme - BH O'bonga MU - 3/5 10:43:21
                         he doesn’t know anything about the constitution - pickle MU - 3/5 09:38:48
               huh? - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/5 09:24:34
                    You're giving deference to SCOTUS even if SCOTUS - ummmm MU - 3/5 09:25:49
                         Article 6, paragraph 2(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/5 09:30:31
                              Why wouldn't the 10th amendment be more applicable? - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/5 09:47:03
                                   b/c the part under discussion is applicable to the 14th and - blake1771 MU - 3/5 10:13:22
                                   The Constitution clearly enumerates Presidential ballot - Spanky KU - 3/5 10:13:08
                                        It does not. (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/5 12:33:07
                                             RE: It does not. (nm) - Spanky KU - 3/5 12:38:57
                                                  Those are age and citizen requirements for the Presidency. - DC Jayhawk KU - 3/5 12:53:55
                              First, the Supremacy Clause doesn't empower - ummmm MU - 3/5 09:35:32
                                   I already answered you what I would support - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/5 09:38:14
                                        And then you implied that the support of your positions is - ummmm MU - 3/5 09:41:16
                              doesn’t say what you think it does (nm) - pickle MU - 3/5 09:32:13
     appeal it all the way up to God, if that's what it takes (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/5 09:15:39




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard