Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Or not.. since the CO Supreme Court stayed their

Posted on: December 28, 2023 at 13:50:24 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144981
Member For:
20.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
order until after an appeal is heard by SCOTUS.

There is no pressing time limit to cause SCOTUS to rush a hearing. They can simply punt the case until after 2024 election and call the case "moot" no matter who is elected.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Am hearing - Ace AU - 12/28 13:28:00
     Or not.. since the CO Supreme Court stayed their - Spanky KU - 12/28 13:50:24
          You always have hope, don't you? - Ace AU - 12/28 14:35:49
          Agree they will do nothing unless. Red States kick off Biden - Coors4bob STL - 12/28 14:28:50
               the mere fact that different conclusions have been taken by - Ace AU - 12/28 15:19:10
               It would be wonderful if multiple states kicked all sorts of - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 12/28 14:37:45
          So contrive to make 14th Amendment to US Constituion moot - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 13:56:05
               do you believe state judges can make - Sal CMSU - 12/28 14:34:15
                    Well gee Beav, there is that sticky point of evidence which - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 15:32:00
                         ^^^ Eddie Haskell ^^^ - Fourth and Long MU - 12/28 15:42:39
                         You should go back and see who the CO - Sal CMSU - 12/28 15:34:07
                              You are not honest friend - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 15:38:01
                                   He didn't organize any such effort - Sal CMSU - 12/28 15:41:26
                                        You got conned, ya putz. Trump never "believed he won" - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 17:57:11
                                             I have never claimed he won the election - Sal CMSU - 12/29 09:21:20
                                   no he didn't (nm) - pickle MU - 12/28 15:39:42
                              you might want to do some more research - pickle MU - 12/28 15:36:29
                         he did no such thing (nm) - pickle MU - 12/28 15:32:42
               The 14th Amdt. was passed in the frenzy of Reconstruction, - BH O'bonga MU - 12/28 14:17:05
                    frenzy? - Ace AU - 12/28 15:20:13
                    Sorry, bongo, in my opinion we cannot after 170 years - hokie VT - 12/28 14:35:50
                         you both are ignorant of the constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 12/28 15:08:40
                         RE: Sorry, bongo, in my opinion we cannot after 170 years - BH O'bonga MU - 12/28 14:43:27
                              I understand that. I just don't think it's relevant. Nm - hokie VT - 12/28 14:45:02
                    Oh really? Gosh. And still it stands as the 14th Amendment - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 14:21:49
                         rask, it's a political move and you're not on a noble side h - 90Tiger STL - 12/28 15:02:36
                              Woa dude, activities invovling overthrow of an election - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 15:34:14
               Trump has not been convicted of (or even charged with) - Spanky KU - 12/28 13:59:05
                    You do not pay attention even a little - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 14:18:20
                         "shall have engaged" - Spanky KU - 12/28 14:33:54
                              Your failure to pay attention, not my problem - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 14:39:19
                                   “Shall” has a meaning in law - Spanky KU - 12/28 17:10:18
                                   Spanked never has understood simple English - JG MU - 12/28 15:12:08
                                        “Shall” has a specific meaning in the law - Spanky KU - 12/28 17:11:06
                                   Has Trump been charged with those crimes? - Sal CMSU - 12/28 14:48:09
                                        Colorado Supreme Court was so persuaded(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 14:49:07
                                             And you think state supreme courts - Sal CMSU - 12/28 14:50:48
                                                  No. And they didn't(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 15:39:05
                                                       What do you mean they didn't? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 12/28 15:43:19
                                                  Sure - JG MU - 12/28 15:14:11
                                                       who's to say they couldn't take what's - Sal CMSU - 12/28 15:18:39
                                                            No one doubts the ability of Trumplican psycophants - JG MU - 12/28 15:22:46
                                                                 plenty of evidence he violated FARA (nm) - Sal CMSU - 12/28 15:28:20
                                                  Notice - Panthera MU - 12/28 14:59:37
                         Didn't think it was possible, but you've managed to lower my - Fourth and Long MU - 12/28 14:29:32
                              RE: Didn't think it was possible, but you've managed to lower my - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 14:34:10
                                   You're definitely an idiot savant nm - pinkman MU - 12/28 14:38:16
                                        Uh no(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 12/28 14:49:36
                    In libtard's eyes Trump was guilty of something before he - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/28 14:01:00
                    I guess there are some that believe in all that America - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 12/28 13:59:53
                         Guilty as charged.....except he's never been charged.(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 12/28 14:01:50




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard