Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

what's the difference between having a law that explicitly

Posted on: July 27, 2022 at 10:09:47 CT
cnk MU
Posts:
190594
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
states it is illegal to masturbate in a park vs a law that defines not following the rules (no wanking) in a public park as trespassing? In both instances, the masturbator would/could be removed from the park.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Let's make it really, really simple - Yes or No question - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:43:01
     no, i don't want gvmt creating and enforcing "morality" - 90Tiger STL - 7/27 14:57:21
     Yes. (nm) - JeffB MU - 7/27 12:22:16
          Not so hard - right?(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 13:28:52
               troll (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 13:46:31
     No - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:30:55
          So it's not against the law in the park. What happens - hokie VT - 7/27 10:45:11
               learn how to ask questions (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:56:58
               It is then trespassing(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:48:59
                    And who enforces trespassing laws? Nm - hokie VT - 7/27 10:51:38
                         First would be park security - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:55:22
                              And then the state....police? So If Pinkel is handing it to - hokie VT - 7/27 11:24:36
                                   Lol - meatiger MU - 7/27 11:26:39
                                        Once again, too stupid to answer, be short vague and - hokie VT - 7/27 11:28:18
                                             It was not a question - meatiger MU - 7/27 11:37:09
                                                  and he obviously has pretty vivid fantasies about pickle - ashtray UF - 7/27 13:13:13
     If she is hot then yes its fine - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 7/27 10:29:30
          sorry didn't read far enough below. - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 7/27 10:30:24
     Yes it should be illegal. - bluesox7 MU - 7/27 10:11:15
     Thanks for the responses - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:09:31
          Thanks for the laugh, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/27 10:14:38
               You are welcome - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:16:39
          the only one who didn’t is GAT - pickle MU - 7/27 10:12:52
          I'm not shocked by your dishonesty at all - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:11:36
               prepare for the swallows to capistrano post (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:14:07
                    *salmon to capistrano(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:21:35
                         i had to look that up (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:22:31
                              I'm embarrassed for you(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:29:48
                              oh come on. - kmawv8 MU - 7/27 10:24:45
                                   never saw the movie - pickle MU - 7/27 10:33:32
                                        oh dear. - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:36:23
          GAT is the only one who didn't answer yes (or its - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:11:06
               hokie equivocated, maybe that's who he's talking about?(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:13:50
                    oh, true (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:14:32
               The string is below - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:12:08
                    Since the string is below, can you identify who did this: - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:36:06
                         It was a yes/no question - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:37:03
                              Only GAT failed to provide a clear yes or no. - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:38:51
                                   he's a troll and uses a smug schtick to cover his cowardice(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:41:35
                                   The thread is the thread - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:39:57
                                        troll (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:41:08
                                        name names(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:40:38
                                             Why? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:42:12
                                                  How about one name? (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:43:38
                                                  because you said there was a "string" of posters who - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:43:30
                                                       Reino didn't answer "yes" or "no" either. - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:17:34
                                                            yes he did (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 11:26:50
                                                                 openly spanking it in the park is an infringement upon - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:30:54
                                                                      “Oh, i was wrong. Reino did answer” (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 11:36:43
                                                                           That's inconsistent with "no"(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:40:04
                                                                                what part of Reino’s “no.” confused you? - pickle MU - 7/27 11:41:39
                                                                                     I'm not confused - I'll give you credit, at least you were - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:47:10
                                                                                          no, you’re definitely confused - pickle MU - 7/27 11:57:16
                                                                                               So, not only are you dumb as shlt, but you're also dishonest - tigerdb MU - 7/27 12:22:27
                                                                                                    holy ****, you are stupid (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 12:29:25
                                                       OK - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:45:26
                                                       He knows that wasn't accurate. - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:44:12
                                                            I just did - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:46:03
                                                                 you’re still being dishonest - pickle MU - 7/27 10:52:58
                                                                 yes, you answered after he asked the question. - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:52:45
                                                            if nothing else, he's given us a good lesson on dishonesty - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:45:53
     No (nm) - kmawv8 MU - 7/27 10:02:00
     No. Unless the action infringes on another individual (s). - hefeweizen MU - 7/27 09:59:59
          What do you consider to be "infringement"? - tigerdb MU - 7/27 10:15:07
               keep me out of your fantasies, please (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 11:27:49
                    Your fantasies = pickletopia - tigerdb MU - 7/27 13:05:41
                         i don’t know what “pickletopia” is - pickle MU - 7/27 13:55:30
                              Liar(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/27 14:24:56
                                   i don’t lie - pickle MU - 7/27 16:02:39
     Yes(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/27 09:59:49
     Few issues can be answered just yes or no. - GA Tiger MU - 7/27 09:59:40
          Doing it at 3 am, when no one is around = "getting away - tigerdb MU - 7/27 10:06:34
          Why can few questions be answered with yes or no? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:01:58
               pickletonians always have a modifier. - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/27 10:09:54
                    GAT is a pickletopian? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:20:10
                         The further one goes right the less - GA Tiger MU - 7/27 11:53:36
                              If you think it doesn't hurt anyone even if little kids are - JeffB MU - 7/27 12:24:35
          apparently 4Tigs needs a law to tell him it's not ok - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:01:44
               False premise. - JeffB MU - 7/27 12:26:58
                    no (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/27 13:11:56
               He does. It's the crutch of Covenentalists (of which - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:09:31
                    The purpose of the law is in no way an expectation that we - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:11:42
                         Yes, that answers justification, however what keeps a - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:17:55
                              A desire to follow God's laws through the power of - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:23:47
                                   what are "God's laws"? - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:32:17
                                        It is always the goal - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:34:39
                                             you didn't answer the question(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:36:55
                                                  Mostly the 10 Commandments - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:38:33
                                                       1. Who decided it was just the 10 commandments? (although - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:41:47
                                                            Christ fulfilled the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:45:01
                                                                 I appreciate you answering. Can you explain how the - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:51:19
                                                                      The ceremonial law was intended to set the children of - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:56:02
                                                                           "However, the moral law remains constant" - dangertim MU - 7/27 11:02:27
                    so basically all Lutherans are immoral and need laws to - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:10:52
                    you made up those words(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:10:32
                         all words are made up, cnk (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:11:40
                              you're made up!(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:11:50
                                   mean(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:20:25
                                        walk it off(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:21:09
                                             wank it off - pickle MU - 7/27 10:21:39
                                                  thank you(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:22:29
     of course it should be(nm) - Spanky KU - 7/27 09:58:53
     are they hot?(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:57:11
          OK - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:57:49
     what makes jerking off in a park more immoral than - ashtray UF - 7/27 09:54:11
          the punishment for cheating on your wife would be MUCH more - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/27 09:59:04
               so it should be against the law, right? (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:00:11
                    only if it happened in a public park(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/27 10:05:54
                         is it less damaging to do it in private? - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:09:50
     yes, but more like regulation than illegal - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 09:53:05
          ^^^^ This.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 7/27 10:00:33
          Trespassing is against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:56:49
               getting at enforcement and punishment - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:01:07
                    Punishment wasn't the issue - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:02:40
                         Lol - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:28:11
                              meated it - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:31:09
                         what's the difference between having a law that explicitly - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:09:47
                              There is no difference - that is my point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:13:24
                                   I gotcha(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:14:48
                         no shlt? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:04:10
          how can you argue trespassing?(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:55:55
               not permitted on the property if you violate the rule (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 09:57:32
                    "shirt, shoes, and penis in pants required"(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:01:32
                         I pictured a big sign of "Park Rules" - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:04:38
                              Just look for the signage - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/27 10:19:49
                         let's see a mock up of the sign (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:03:26
                              BOAISY(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:06:21
                    ok. I'll allow it.(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:59:34
     no(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:52:07
     Yes of course. Unless it's a black, Hispanic, gay, female, - hokie VT - 7/27 09:52:03
          Thanks Rush (nm) - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/27 10:13:09
          you have weird beliefs(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:52:54
               most Marxists do (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/27 09:53:15
     No. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/27 09:49:49
     yes - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/27 09:48:45
     Is a sammich involved? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 7/27 09:48:42
     Yes (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/27 09:48:08
     no. let’s make it simple: whose rights are infringed upon - pickle MU - 7/27 09:47:57
     YES. - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/27 09:45:12
          Not surprising who is struggling with yes/no on this - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:57:31
               no one is struggling (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:03:18
               maybe it's the false premise? - ashtray UF - 7/27 09:59:45
                    yep (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:03:35
          We shall certainly see - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:48:29




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard