Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Well, the OP substack isn't R v. D either.

Posted on: February 10, 2022 at 08:52:47 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
But, it's good to see that CNBC is running articles about the disastrous changes that have occurred over the past two years.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

40% increase in deaths of 18-64 - fatrat MU - 2/10 08:04:58
     Why do you say not COVID? That isn't what the CEO says. - TigerMatt STL - 2/10 09:30:21
     There could be multiple reasons for this - DC Jayhawk KU - 2/10 09:00:59
     It’s OK, probably mostly crackers. If they were - hokie VT - 2/10 08:22:53
     could also be due to drug overdoses. - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/10 08:12:48
          How many cancer screening were missed because they were - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:17:02
               Could also be stress related due to - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:23:42
     40% increase in deaths of 18-64: Life insurance companies - BH O'bonga MU - 2/10 08:08:49
          Name the companies that are reported this 40% increase(nm) - dangertim MU - 2/10 08:45:18
               OneAmerica.. but the CEO doesn't say it is non-COVID. - TigerMatt STL - 2/10 09:31:01
          Non-kook link? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:09:42
               Another deceptive Substack author.. these people have no - TigerMatt STL - 2/10 09:36:19
                    How about this part? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 11:36:36
               A link to CNN or PMSNBC is a non-kook link? - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/10 08:10:28
                    They aren't substack - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:12:20
                         No, they are much worse when it comes to accurately - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:19:34
                              P.S. Here's an example of anyone with a connection - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:47:17
                              You should start checking in on CNBC - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:21:14
                                   Here's the lead article on CNBC's health page: - ummmm MU - 2/10 08:36:38
                                        OK - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:39:35
                                             Well, the OP substack isn't R v. D either. - ummmm MU - 2/10 08:52:47
                                                  Actually she's quoting Malone - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:55:48
                                                       But not R v. D (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/10 08:58:08
                                                            Just not credible - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:58:58
                                                                 Are you concerned about his credentials? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/10 09:01:50
                                                                      Malone? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 09:03:01
                                                                           he's not insane. - dangertim MU - 2/10 09:16:48
                                                                                That's fair - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 09:19:38
                                                                                     very mad, but he's found a good revenue stream - dangertim MU - 2/10 09:32:41
                                                                                          You're not wrong - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 11:33:58
     Just gonna throw this out there - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:08:32
          google it,,,other sources,, nope not on fake cnbc nm - fatrat MU - 2/10 09:26:43
          What, you fascist progs haven't cancelled Substack yet? LOL - BH O'bonga MU - 2/10 08:10:23
               I think those are suspect as well - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:13:57
                    And you think today's journalist are any different? LOL(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:21:23
                         Yes - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:22:06
                              that's cute. You keep going to your verified blue check - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:23:38
                                   Anyone who thinks CNBC is a 'blue check mark' - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:24:21
               They're trying - Wildcat KSU - 2/10 08:13:22
          Right, you keep reading CNN, NYT and your other reliable - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:10:10
               CNBC is my go to - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:10:53
                    And you think CNBC is unbiased? The sister station of MSNBC - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:12:04
                         Yes - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:13:02
                              This might help - Wildcat KSU - 2/10 08:31:27
                                   They have CNBC as centrist but the people strongly - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:44:51
                                        Well look at who started the site and - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:46:04
                                   Quick glance at that says Axios is centered - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:34:53
                              Lol(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 2/10 08:29:07
                              How many stories did they run on Russian Collusion? - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:20:44
                                   They have a search function - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:22:52
                              So you defer to jew-run media? - glue MU - 2/10 08:18:50
                                   I still don't understand the issue with jews - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/10 08:22:01
                                   If they're accurate and unbiased - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:21:47
                                        RE: If they're accurate and unbiased - You have no way - glue MU - 2/10 08:27:29
                                             If the kooks are saying it - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:32:52
                              Too busy catchin up on FoxNEWS - Wildcat KSU - 2/10 08:14:21




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard