Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It’s OK, probably mostly crackers. If they were

Posted on: February 10, 2022 at 08:22:53 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68174
Member For:
9.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
disproportionately black, there would be riots in the streets and people screaming about racism, reparations, and retribution.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

40% increase in deaths of 18-64 - fatrat MU - 2/10 08:04:58
     Why do you say not COVID? That isn't what the CEO says. - TigerMatt STL - 2/10 09:30:21
     There could be multiple reasons for this - DC Jayhawk KU - 2/10 09:00:59
     It’s OK, probably mostly crackers. If they were - hokie VT - 2/10 08:22:53
     could also be due to drug overdoses. - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/10 08:12:48
          How many cancer screening were missed because they were - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:17:02
               Could also be stress related due to - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:23:42
     40% increase in deaths of 18-64: Life insurance companies - BH O'bonga MU - 2/10 08:08:49
          Name the companies that are reported this 40% increase(nm) - dangertim MU - 2/10 08:45:18
               OneAmerica.. but the CEO doesn't say it is non-COVID. - TigerMatt STL - 2/10 09:31:01
          Non-kook link? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:09:42
               Another deceptive Substack author.. these people have no - TigerMatt STL - 2/10 09:36:19
                    How about this part? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 11:36:36
               A link to CNN or PMSNBC is a non-kook link? - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/10 08:10:28
                    They aren't substack - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:12:20
                         No, they are much worse when it comes to accurately - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:19:34
                              P.S. Here's an example of anyone with a connection - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:47:17
                              You should start checking in on CNBC - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:21:14
                                   Here's the lead article on CNBC's health page: - ummmm MU - 2/10 08:36:38
                                        OK - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:39:35
                                             Well, the OP substack isn't R v. D either. - ummmm MU - 2/10 08:52:47
                                                  Actually she's quoting Malone - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:55:48
                                                       But not R v. D (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/10 08:58:08
                                                            Just not credible - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:58:58
                                                                 Are you concerned about his credentials? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/10 09:01:50
                                                                      Malone? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 09:03:01
                                                                           he's not insane. - dangertim MU - 2/10 09:16:48
                                                                                That's fair - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 09:19:38
                                                                                     very mad, but he's found a good revenue stream - dangertim MU - 2/10 09:32:41
                                                                                          You're not wrong - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 11:33:58
     Just gonna throw this out there - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:08:32
          google it,,,other sources,, nope not on fake cnbc nm - fatrat MU - 2/10 09:26:43
          What, you fascist progs haven't cancelled Substack yet? LOL - BH O'bonga MU - 2/10 08:10:23
               I think those are suspect as well - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:13:57
                    And you think today's journalist are any different? LOL(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:21:23
                         Yes - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:22:06
                              that's cute. You keep going to your verified blue check - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:23:38
                                   Anyone who thinks CNBC is a 'blue check mark' - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:24:21
               They're trying - Wildcat KSU - 2/10 08:13:22
          Right, you keep reading CNN, NYT and your other reliable - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:10:10
               CNBC is my go to - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:10:53
                    And you think CNBC is unbiased? The sister station of MSNBC - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:12:04
                         Yes - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:13:02
                              This might help - Wildcat KSU - 2/10 08:31:27
                                   They have CNBC as centrist but the people strongly - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:44:51
                                        Well look at who started the site and - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:46:04
                                   Quick glance at that says Axios is centered - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:34:53
                              Lol(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 2/10 08:29:07
                              How many stories did they run on Russian Collusion? - DHighlander NWMSU - 2/10 08:20:44
                                   They have a search function - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:22:52
                              So you defer to jew-run media? - glue MU - 2/10 08:18:50
                                   I still don't understand the issue with jews - mizzouSECedes STL - 2/10 08:22:01
                                   If they're accurate and unbiased - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:21:47
                                        RE: If they're accurate and unbiased - You have no way - glue MU - 2/10 08:27:29
                                             If the kooks are saying it - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/10 08:32:52
                              Too busy catchin up on FoxNEWS - Wildcat KSU - 2/10 08:14:21




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard