Welcome Guest

No

Posted on: January 22, 2022 at 13:42:14 CT
MIZ45 KC
Posts:
37351
Member For:
16.03 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
In general, your stupid "gamble" in the OP would be a nearly 99% win for someone wishing to beat COVID with their immune system. As is proven now and was proven before the vax came about.

Obviously, there are certain risk factors for some individuals that would decrease someone's chances of surviving COVID without the vaccine, but you said nothing about that.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Ask Meat Loaf about gambling (nm) - Grasslands MU - 1/22 15:39:44
     It’s proving more durable than the vaccines - Sal CMSU - 1/22 14:17:54
     Gambling an mRNA Vax won’t have long term health affects - TigerFan92 STL - 1/22 14:17:07
          Satan has told less lies than you.(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 1/22 14:21:28
               He’s in your mirror(nm) - TigerFan92 STL - 1/22 14:23:06
     '"gambling" on 200k years of evolution - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 13:38:49
          That obviously can't apply if this virus never - GA Tiger MU - 1/22 14:10:37
          You'll have no effect there.(nm) - Toger STL - 1/22 13:41:33
               take it up with your daughter - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/22 13:48:50
     RE: Gambling on natural immunity to COVID is a sucker’s bet - Catturd USMC - 1/22 13:30:55
     The chance of winning that bet is >99% - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 13:28:04
          Better odds to let a live copperhead or rattlesnake bite you - chigger MU - 1/22 16:09:25
               Ok - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 16:27:22
                    It shows that not getting the shot is a sucker's bet which - chigger MU - 1/22 16:42:37
                         It's not a sucker's bet to the average American - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 16:51:02
                              I think its wise for most adults to get the vax, as death - chigger MU - 1/22 17:11:29
                                   I agree with that (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 17:17:11
                                        Cool, common ground (nm) - chigger MU - 1/22 17:46:59
          RE: The chance of winning that bet is >99% - *M* KC - 1/22 13:34:42
               Exactly, when calculating risk things that have a relatively - chigger MU - 1/22 16:16:43
               1:100 odds aren't even close to being comparable here, - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 13:36:20
                    That might depend on how big your ">" is.(nm) - Toger STL - 1/22 13:38:47
                         Lol. Weirdo. (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 13:42:26
                    RE: 1:100 odds aren't even close to being comparable here, - *M* KC - 1/22 13:38:43
                         No - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 13:42:14
          RE: The chance of winning that bet is >99% - Toger STL - 1/22 13:31:50
               RE: The chance of winning that bet is >99% - Catturd USMC - 1/22 13:35:20
               Can't see your post. iOS (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 1/22 13:34:16




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard