Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Well, that sucks. (nm)

Posted on: October 29, 2021 at 14:46:09 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
12.82 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Parsons signs bill banning gramps vax mandate(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/29 12:35:41
     fake news (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:03:26
          b/c it was an EO?(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 13:04:01
               it doesn't ban the mandates - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:09:12
                    RE: it doesn't ban the mandates - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:11:25
                         Whereas I didn't read the important part carefully(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 13:13:41
                              lol (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:21:54
     But did Parson sign it? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/29 12:53:03
          is this some sort of conspiracy theory? - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:58:14
     Means nothing. It only covers state agencies (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/29 12:41:29
     Nullification. What a great thing. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:38:02
          except that's not what this is (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:13:41
               Well, that sucks. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/29 14:46:09
                    I don't know how they could even be nullified - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 14:49:30
     Yay! More government to limit government - Hbombtiger STL - 10/29 12:38:02
          Good grief. We don't need another JG here (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 10/29 13:08:21
          lol no (nm) - pickle MU - 10/29 12:58:33
          No, it's not confusing at all (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/29 12:45:19
          lol only the incredibly stupid(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/29 12:43:50
          No, this is nullification of unconstitutional federal action - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:38:37
               Thats the supreme courts job (nm) - Hbombtiger STL - 10/29 12:48:12
                    lmfao, go back to bed, GA (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/29 17:08:27
                    🤦‍♂️ (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 10/29 13:09:39
                    No it isn’t - pickle MU - 10/29 12:59:02
                    Good grief. It's even in MW - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:55:14
                         Although, I agree more with Ummmm's explaination below vvvv - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:55:59
                    No, that is the job of every individual, locality, and state - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:53:29
                         because SCOTUS said so in M v M so... - 90Tiger STL - 10/29 17:09:16
                    nope (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/29 12:49:33
                    lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/29 12:49:07
               you're trying to reason someone who rinses refuse(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:41:59




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard