Welcome Guest

it doesn't ban the mandates

Posted on: October 29, 2021 at 13:09:12 CT

SwampTiger MU

Posts:

55337

Member For:

25.38 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

it directs the ex. branch to support the AG in lawsuit
directs ex. branch agencies to allow medical and religious exemptions
and directs ex. branch to not penalize any business for allowing those exemptions

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Parsons signs bill banning gramps vax mandate(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/29 12:35:41

fake news (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:03:26

b/c it was an EO?(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 13:04:01

it doesn't ban the mandates - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:09:12

RE: it doesn't ban the mandates - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:11:25

Whereas I didn't read the important part carefully(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 13:13:41

lol (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:21:54

But did Parson sign it? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/29 12:53:03

is this some sort of conspiracy theory? - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:58:14

Means nothing. It only covers state agencies (nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 10/29 12:41:29

Nullification. What a great thing. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:38:02

except that's not what this is (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:13:41

Well, that sucks. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/29 14:46:09

I don't know how they could even be nullified - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 14:49:30

Yay! More government to limit government - Hbombtiger STL - 10/29 12:38:02

Good grief. We don't need another JG here (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 10/29 13:08:21

lol no (nm) - pickle MU

- 10/29 12:58:33

No, it's not confusing at all (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/29 12:45:19

lol only the incredibly stupid(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/29 12:43:50

No, this is nullification of unconstitutional federal action - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:38:37

Thats the supreme courts job (nm) - Hbombtiger STL - 10/29 12:48:12

lmfao, go back to bed, GA (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/29 17:08:27

🤦‍♂️ (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 10/29 13:09:39

No it isn’t - pickle MU

- 10/29 12:59:02

Good grief. It's even in MW - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:55:14

Although, I agree more with Ummmm's explaination below vvvv - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:55:59

No, that is the job of every individual, locality, and state - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:53:29

because SCOTUS said so in M v M so... - 90Tiger STL - 10/29 17:09:16

nope (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/29 12:49:33

lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/29 12:49:07

you're trying to reason someone who rinses refuse(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:41:59