Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: it doesn't ban the mandates

Posted on: October 29, 2021 at 13:11:25 CT
SwampTiger MU
Posts:
55337
Member For:
25.38 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
All agencies, boards, commissions, and other entities within the executive branch of state government are directed to cooperate fully and timely with the Attorney General of the State of Missouri in furtherance of any litigation filed by the Attorney General on behalf of the State of Missouri against any federally imposed COVID-19 vaccine mandate or requirement.

No agency, board, commission, or other entity within the executive branch of state government shall compel any individual to receive the COVID-19 vaccine pursuant to federal vaccine mandate where such individual objects by reason of sincerely held religious belief or for medical reasons.

No agency, board, commission, or other entity within the executive branch of state government shall, under color of state law, impose a penalty on any individual or business for non-compliance with any federally imposed COVID-19 vaccine mandate or requirement where non-compliance is the result of an individual’s sincerely held religious belief or for medical reasons.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Parsons signs bill banning gramps vax mandate(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/29 12:35:41
     fake news (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:03:26
          b/c it was an EO?(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 13:04:01
               it doesn't ban the mandates - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:09:12
                    RE: it doesn't ban the mandates - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:11:25
                         Whereas I didn't read the important part carefully(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 13:13:41
                              lol (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:21:54
     But did Parson sign it? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/29 12:53:03
          is this some sort of conspiracy theory? - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:58:14
     Means nothing. It only covers state agencies (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/29 12:41:29
     Nullification. What a great thing. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:38:02
          except that's not what this is (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 13:13:41
               Well, that sucks. (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/29 14:46:09
                    I don't know how they could even be nullified - SwampTiger MU - 10/29 14:49:30
     Yay! More government to limit government - Hbombtiger STL - 10/29 12:38:02
          Good grief. We don't need another JG here (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 10/29 13:08:21
          lol no (nm) - pickle MU - 10/29 12:58:33
          No, it's not confusing at all (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/29 12:45:19
          lol only the incredibly stupid(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/29 12:43:50
          No, this is nullification of unconstitutional federal action - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:38:37
               Thats the supreme courts job (nm) - Hbombtiger STL - 10/29 12:48:12
                    lmfao, go back to bed, GA (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/29 17:08:27
                    🤦‍♂️ (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 10/29 13:09:39
                    No it isn’t - pickle MU - 10/29 12:59:02
                    Good grief. It's even in MW - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:55:14
                         Although, I agree more with Ummmm's explaination below vvvv - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:55:59
                    No, that is the job of every individual, locality, and state - ummmm MU - 10/29 12:53:29
                         because SCOTUS said so in M v M so... - 90Tiger STL - 10/29 17:09:16
                    nope (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/29 12:49:33
                    lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/29 12:49:07
               you're trying to reason someone who rinses refuse(nm) - dangertim ATL - 10/29 12:41:59




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard