Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I did not say that everyone would be infected after 200 days

Posted on: October 10, 2021 at 23:42:39 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
70119
Member For:
20.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and agree that it means that .5% were getting infected every day by the end of the study.

It's been awhile since I have taken statistics, so maybe someone could crunch the numbers for us:

If .5% of Americans were infected with {some new disease} every day, what percentage of Americans would be infected after 200 days? What percentage after a year? ... perhaps using an expected value or 1 or 2 standard deviations.

I am sure it would be "most" Americans would be infected.

If you were asked prior to 2020 "If most people vaccinated with a vaccine for a new disease would in fact become infected with that disease within a year, would you consider that a 'vaccine'?" what do you think your answer would have been?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

All you need to know about vaccine failure in one incredible - JeffB MU - 10/10 21:42:53
     RE: All you need to know about vaccine failure in one incredible - raskolnikov MU - 10/11 07:35:14
          At least a couple of problems with your response. 1. You - JeffB MU - 10/11 10:24:19
     In a sense Berensen is right - JG MU - 10/10 22:30:34
          Looks like the gubmit 'science' about natural - Newcatbirdseat MU - 10/10 22:34:41
               LOL I don't get my science from Yahoo - JG MU - 10/10 22:38:01
                    Yer Free To Vaxxterminate Yerself Boy - Catturd USMC - 10/10 23:03:03
                         I'm gonna vaccinate your cats.(nm) - TigerMatt KC - 10/10 23:56:08
                    Oh, my bad. I figured that since that's the only - Newcatbirdseat MU - 10/10 22:45:35
                         another point of fact, - JG MU - 10/10 22:50:36
                              LOL incoherent psycho rant - Wildcat KSU - 10/10 23:28:00
                              LAUGH - Catturd USMC - 10/10 23:06:53
                              Popular Mechanics. - Newcatbirdseat MU - 10/10 22:51:33
                                   still an upgrade for you - JG MU - 10/10 22:58:18
     Basically the study showed that if you do drugs you - TigerMatt KC - 10/10 22:17:30
          No, you are leaving out key facts. Yes, the study showed - JeffB MU - 10/10 22:47:59
               From the study. The breakthrough rate was 3.6%. - TigerMatt KC - 10/10 23:10:35
                    and their chart started in December 2020, when almost no one - JeffB MU - 10/10 23:31:06
                         So? End of August was the peak. The numbers of daily - TigerMatt KC - 10/10 23:55:15
                              So? The point is that the 'vaccines' fail on a grand scale - JeffB MU - 10/11 10:28:11
     where's the chart on the unvaccinated cohort?(nm) - dangertim MU - 10/10 22:02:25
     LOL OMG - JG MU - 10/10 21:58:50
          Blasphemer And - Catturd USMC - 10/10 22:06:32
     It’s hard to believe there are still people - *M* KC - 10/10 21:56:10
          Are you too so flummoxed by the facts that you must lash out - JeffB MU - 10/10 22:04:57
               RE: Are you too so flummoxed by the facts that you must lash out - *M* KC - 10/10 22:22:42
                    He's quoting a peer reviewed journal using 550,000 medical - JeffB MU - 10/10 22:32:25
                         The quotes and graphs are taken out of context - JG MU - 10/10 22:35:59
                              Please explain to us how it is 'meaningless' that 1 in 200 - JeffB MU - 10/10 22:50:33
                                   I will patiently explain to you that 900,000 vaccinated - JG MU - 10/10 22:57:13
                                        No, of course not, and I never asserted that they were. - JeffB MU - 10/10 23:27:07
                                   are you talking about "cases"?(nm) - dangertim MU - 10/10 22:51:40
                                        Yes, as previously noted, the study is of 'breakthrough - JeffB MU - 10/10 23:08:50
                                             For what its worth to you - JG MU - 10/10 23:13:53
                                                  My point was not that it does not reduce symptoms nor that - JeffB MU - 10/10 23:33:57
               thanks for linking. from the discussion: - dangertim MU - 10/10 22:14:10
                    Or this - TigerMatt KC - 10/10 22:19:25
                         see, I told ya it's a failed vaccine(nm) - dangertim MU - 10/10 22:20:29
                              It’s silly you dismiss the vaccine as a failure because it - tiger4real MU - 10/10 22:24:53
                                   who ever said it would be zero (besides the drooler in the - dangertim MU - 10/10 22:29:15
               Sounds like Science to me - Catturd USMC - 10/10 22:09:02
     RE: All you need to know about vaccine failure in one incredible - TigerMatt KC - 10/10 21:45:32
          So you can't engage the facts presented & must resort - JeffB MU - 10/10 21:49:38
               a 0.0005 case rate sounds bad. what was the case rate for - dangertim MU - 10/10 22:03:55
                    The failure rate for a vaccine is when one gets the disease - JeffB MU - 10/10 22:29:34
                         A rate of 1 in 200, doesn't mean after 200 days everyone - TigerMatt KC - 10/10 23:16:39
                              I did not say that everyone would be infected after 200 days - JeffB MU - 10/10 23:42:39
                                   Yes you pretty much did - JG MU - 10/11 11:42:21
                         by your definition, the following are not vaccines, bc they - dangertim MU - 10/10 22:41:33
                              So you are saying that the CDC is incompetent and had a - JeffB MU - 10/10 22:55:07
                                   I wouldn't trust anything a govt bureaucracy says - if they - dangertim MU - 10/10 23:01:30




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard