years and I believe they are all NKJV.
So your assertion that I've changed versions to make a point on this is a flat out lie.
I use KJV for KJV only types, and multiple versions to show uniformity of translation into English by various versions. To the best of my knowledge, Strong's doesn't have a NKJV Concordance. As such, I showed that the KJV and the NKJV translate it the same.
My initial comment was comparing the child's interest as compared to the parents. Somehow you didn't jump in and slam the person for claiming the child belonged to the mother. Why attack my comment, when for years I've said that God is the owner; while ignoring the pro-abortionists' comment that the mother owned the body?
Because you would side with the abortionist before agreeing with me because of your hate for God, whose existence you deny.
http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15432325