 |
|
No, none of the factors are important to the analogy made
Posted on: August 5, 2021 at 12:46:39 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
in response to your post.
The analogy is this: the painter goes up the ladder, and he is injured due to a fall. Without getting into whether the painter was comparatively at fault, you would argue (per your first post in this thread) that the employer could simply say: "Why am I liable? Going up that ladder was a condition of the painter keeping his job and he voluntarily went up that ladder".
The analogy is this: the painter goes up the ladder, and he is injured due to a fall. Without getting into whether the painter was comparatively at fault, you would argue (per your first post in this thread) that the employer could simply say: "Why am I liable? Going up that ladder was a condition of the painter keeping his job and he voluntarily went up that ladder".
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
No, none of the factors are important to the analogy made - ummmm MU - 8/5 12:46:39