Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

That is one aspect of the law(s) I was referring to.

Posted on: July 19, 2021 at 11:11:43 CT
kmawv8 MU
Posts:
90436
Member For:
15.29 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
And I made no comment about whether or not I agreed with the laws. But the fact that he crossed state lines to do what he did, IS newsworthy, regardless of how far he travelled.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I'd give the guy a medal for marksmanship. Hope he - hokie VT - 7/19 10:52:10
     on a side note... - tigerNkc KC - 7/19 11:01:12
          For multiple reasons. - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:03:46
               So one can only defend themselves in their home state? (nm) - tcat KC - 7/19 11:07:26
                    That is one aspect of the law(s) I was referring to. - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:11:43
                         I wonder if a teen from olathe traveling to downtown KC for - tigerNkc KC - 7/19 11:16:19
                              from the national media? Yes. The whole state line - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:18:54
                              If crossing the state line factored into legal ramifications - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:18:22
                    it's the law passed by democratically-elected - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:09:57
     is stealing a running car really "carjacking"?(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/19 10:57:56
          no, no it's not (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 10:59:14
               yeah, now that i think of it. Assuming carjacking is - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:01:12
               Then what is it? (nm) - tcat KC - 7/19 10:59:59
                    "carjacking" involves violence - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:01:41
                         so is hoping in a car that is not running and driving away - tcat KC - 7/19 11:05:13
                              Correct. - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:06:58
                    stealing a car(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:00:16
                         So is a carjacking only when someone is in said car? (nm) - tcat KC - 7/19 11:06:04
                              Yes, that is part of the definition. (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:07:15
                                   ok, I understand where you are coming from. (nm) - tcat KC - 7/19 11:08:51
     More stupidity… - Outsider MU - 7/19 10:55:17
     wrong board - pickle MU - 7/19 10:53:14
          Honest question for my education. - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:00:02
               that’s a good question - pickle MU - 7/19 11:03:02
                    I agree. follow up: - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:11:28
                         Hire a private investigator to find where the car is. - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:14:27
                              correct - pickle MU - 7/19 11:16:48
                                   the emotional part of my brain wants to retaliate - but - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:23:55
                                   And perhaps the car wasn't worth tracking it down - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:21:49
                              but at that point, it's in her possession, so therefore it's - dangertim MU - 7/19 11:15:57
                                   Which is why ownership is more nuanced than possession (nm) - kmawv8 KC - 7/19 11:20:30
                                   DH would say she’s the de facto owner (nm) - pickle MU - 7/19 11:17:18
                                        He would also point out that you still do not - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/19 12:20:53
                                             no (nm) - pickle MU - 7/19 12:35:25
     And to the DA for marxmanship. nm - hokie VT - 7/19 10:52:52




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard