Welcome Guest

I hear you, and if censure carried real consequence I would

Posted on: February 15, 2021 at 15:34:29 CT

4TigersinMichigan MU

Posts:

126077

Member For:

22.62 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

agree. But to only hold Senators accountable every 6 years is woefully weak. And they are absolutely allowed to vote their conscience. But I think the party is allowed to speak their collective conscience as well right back at them. If Senators can't take the heat of people back home saying publicly "We disagree" they should not hold the office.

Edited by 4TigersinMichigan at 15:35:10 on 02/15/21

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I disagree with censuring Sen Burr in NC. He is an ass hole - hokie VT - 2/15 15:11:51

starting to figure out there is no difference now? (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/15 15:36:02

I disagree, and here is why - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/15 15:18:34

It means nothing. It is interesting that Burr would be - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 15:36:58

He felt the process was unconstituional - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/15 15:44:57

Fair points all. But there is a better way to let him know - hokie VT - 2/15 15:31:32

I hear you, and if censure carried real consequence I would - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/15 15:34:29

who cares? (nm) - pickle MU

- 2/15 15:12:48

censuring somebody doesn't require an offense (nm) - Sal MU

- 2/15 15:12:46

It is an official act of rebuke levied by the party. It is - hokie VT - 2/15 15:16:22