Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

its a poll tax pure and simple

Posted on: November 9, 2020 at 15:03:41 CT
JG MU
Posts:
255471
Member For:
21.51 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
127
SCOTUS refused to hear the case prior to the election
undeniable fact
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

for those in the 'Biden's won' camp - DesertTiger MU - 11/9 14:27:18
     BDS level defcon 2 (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 11/9 14:55:12
     The Trump/GOP mistake was not allowing mail-in - doughboy MU - 11/9 14:44:56
          You actually are getting close to the salient question. - Macgrantt MU - 11/9 15:00:43
               It was done precisely to cause the chaos that - JG A - 11/9 15:05:24
                    Some people can - Macgrantt MU - 11/9 15:09:31
                         I agree even as late as say July - JG A - 11/9 15:13:50
     Considering that almost 150 million people voted in - *M* KC - 11/9 14:43:30
          You wanted Trump to win - tman MU - 11/9 14:47:26
          both sides allege fraud - meatiger MU - 11/9 14:45:37
               conservative here - JG A - 11/9 14:49:14
                    The way you just make stuff up and throw it out there - *M* KC - 11/9 14:52:36
                         I have posted ample evidence of all of that - JG A - 11/9 14:55:17
                              Do you realize that calling something - *M* KC - 11/9 14:58:08
                                   its a poll tax pure and simple - JG A - 11/9 15:03:41
                                        You're a lot like Trump. Presenting your opinions as - *M* KC - 11/9 15:05:03
                                             what else would it be called - JG A - 11/9 15:07:29
                                                  RE: what else would it be called - *M* KC - 11/9 15:10:16
                                                       Hahahahaha so a poll tax - JG A - 11/9 15:12:53
                              No.. you haven't posted any evidence. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 11/9 14:57:18
                                   LOL yes - JG A - 11/9 15:04:15
               It's not just since "they won". It's pretty damn hard to - kmawv8 MU - 11/9 14:47:08
                    700K in Fla, 99,000 wisc - JG A - 11/9 14:51:13
                    oh..they would(nm) - meatiger MU - 11/9 14:48:16
     No, but I will revisit my answer if you can be specific as - miz_zou MU - 11/9 14:37:51
     It went about as predicted - meatiger MU - 11/9 14:36:09
     Those old people, working at the polling stations are like - Toger STL - 11/9 14:31:58
          so, that's not a direct answer - DesertTiger MU - 11/9 14:33:02
               There was no sunshine on most of the counting - Toger STL - 11/9 14:39:07
     "non-standard"? Absolutely. - kmawv8 MU - 11/9 14:31:45
     no. nm - bornoncampus MU - 11/9 14:30:09
     there was ample voter suppression - JG A - 11/9 14:29:35
          Fairest, clearest and most transparent? - kmawv8 MU - 11/9 14:43:51
               50,000 Trumpers didn't find a single case - JG A - 11/9 14:45:54
          One of the stupidest things you have ever posted. - RHAYWORTH MU - 11/9 14:41:12
               nailed it didn't I - JG A - 11/9 14:45:23
     It actually all makes sense - Ace AU - 11/9 14:29:32
     nope - Iam4Mizzou MU - 11/9 14:28:55




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard