Welcome Guest

LBJ's nominee, Fortas, was rejected by a Democratic Senate

Posted on: October 12, 2020 at 16:25:56 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
69113
Member For:
20.82 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
Ethics scandal and resignation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abe_Fortas#Ethics_scandal_and_resignation

Fortas remained an associate justice, but in 1969, a new scandal arose. Fortas had accepted a US$20,000 (US$139,437 in 2019 dollars[27]) retainer from the family foundation of Wall Street financier Louis Wolfson, a friend and former client, in January 1966.[28] Fortas had signed a contract with Wolfson's foundation. In return for unspecified advice, it was to pay Fortas $20,000 a year for the rest of Fortas's life (and then pay his widow for the rest of her life). Wolfson was under investigation for securities violations at the time, and it was alleged that he expected that his arrangement with Fortas would help him stave off criminal charges or help him secure a presidential pardon. He asked Fortas to help him secure a pardon from Johnson, which Fortas claimed that he did not do. Fortas recused himself from Wolfson's case when it came before the Court and had earlier returned the retainer but not until Wolfson had been indicted twice.[6]

Fortas's judicial reputation was also affected by the previous Johnson consultation and American University scandals.[16] The new Richard Nixon administration became aware of the Wolfson deal when a Life reporter began investigating the story. FBI director J. Edgar Hoover also mentioned a "tax dodge" Fortas had entered into with other judges, and Nixon concluded Fortas should be "off of there."[6] When Chief Justice Earl Warren was informed of the incident by the new Attorney General John N. Mitchell, he persuaded Fortas to resign to protect the reputation of the Court and avoid lengthy impeachment proceedings, which were in their preliminary stages.[6] Justice Hugo Black also urged Fortas to resign, but when Fortas said it would "kill" his wife, Black changed his mind and urged Fortas not to resign. Days after impeachment proceedings formally began with a resolution introduced by Rep. H. R. Gross (R-Iowa), Fortas decided resignation would be best for him and for his wife's legal career, he reportedly told his colleagues. William J. Brennan later said, "We were just stunned." Fortas later said he "resigned to save Douglas," another justice who was being investigated for a similar scandal at the same time.[6]

Fortas resigned from the Court on May 14, 1969.

In 1970, Louis Wolfson surreptitiously taped a private telephone call with Fortas. The transcript of this call was disclosed by Wolfson's lawyer, Bernard Fensterwald, to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward in 1977. The Washington Post subsequently published several excerpts from the transcript, including language suggesting that Fortas might indeed have spoken with President Johnson about a pardon for Wolfson, but there is no evidence that it was a quid pro quo rather than a voluntary intervention for a friend. Wolfson was convicted of violating federal securities laws later that year and spent time in prison.

Fortas's seat on the Supreme Court was vacant for nearly the court's entire 1969–70 term. President Nixon eventually appointed Harry Blackmun as Fortas's replacement after the nominations of Clement Haynsworth and G. Harrold Carswell had failed.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     IF THIS was about appointing highly qualified - JG MU - 10/12 15:57:52
          Do you think Amy Coney Barret is not highly qualified? Or - JeffB MU - 10/12 16:00:36
               She is going to be the legislator from the bench - JG MU - 10/12 16:17:51
                    This is seriously one of the dumbest fùcking things I’ve - MIZ45 MU - 10/12 16:25:00
     Garland was worse than Borked. He was ghosted. Nn - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 15:36:45
          Garland came AFTER the Democrats changed the rules of the - JeffB MU - 10/12 15:55:01
               No rules were changed, Jeff (nm) - pickle MU - 10/12 16:06:19
                    Repitition cannot make a false assertion true pickle. (nm) - JeffB MU - 10/12 16:14:26
                         so what rule was changed? - pickle MU - 10/12 16:18:21
                              Damn pickle, how explicitly does it need to be spelled out - JeffB MU - 10/12 16:33:10
                                   so no rules were changed - pickle MU - 10/12 16:46:00
                                        Would it make you feel better, to say how they applied - tman MU - 10/12 19:41:57
               I don't accept your feeble attempt at revising history. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 15:56:02
                    How is that revising history? Can you point to a single exam - JeffB MU - 10/12 15:57:00
                         Fortas wasn't confirmed as Chief Justice because of some - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 16:12:06
                              LBJ's nominee, Fortas, was rejected by a Democratic Senate - JeffB MU - 10/12 16:25:56
                         because you’re lying - pickle MU - 10/12 16:06:55
          RE: Garland was worse than Borked: In what universe is that - BH O'bonga MU - 10/12 15:54:11
          Bork was slandered by Dems and essentially forced to - Spanky KU - 10/12 15:50:53
          Elections have consequences - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/12 15:42:31
               Yes, they do. Presidents appoint judges. The Senate provides - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 15:46:46
                    Fortunately, I think your dream will evaporate and the - JeffB MU - 10/12 15:59:15
                         The fascist (or Trump-type) leadership will be averted, and - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 16:05:54
                    Perhaps a few more SC justices as well. - kcnorthside KC - 10/12 15:53:48
                    There will never be 52 states (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 10/12 15:53:28
                    Lol you are dumb as hell(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/12 15:53:00
                    why are you stupid? (nm) - pickle MU - 10/12 15:50:50
                         Why are you a dishonest jackass? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 15:51:52
                              why are you stupid? (nm) - pickle MU - 10/12 16:05:45
               He still doesn't know what stacking the court is - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/12 15:44:27
                    Yes, you are dishonest and stupid. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 15:47:34
                         So tell us, what is court stacking?(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/12 15:48:35
                              Asked and answered. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 10/12 15:55:05
                                   I mean the correct answer - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/12 16:15:08
          Was his court stacked? I mean, that is really the question(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/12 15:41:16
     That's because the f-ing Dems are a bunch of lemmings - Deputy Dawg MU - 10/12 15:30:38
     I’ll ask again: what rule was changed? - pickle MU - 10/12 15:19:15
          I figured you weren't willing or able to actually discuss - JeffB MU - 10/12 15:29:44
               answer the question: what rule was changed? (nm) - pickle MU - 10/12 15:32:26
                    Your mental illness is showing again pickle. Are you really - JeffB MU - 10/12 15:51:49
                         so no rules were changed. why did you say they were? - pickle MU - 10/12 16:00:20
                              I fail to see how what you quoted has any bearing on your - JeffB MU - 10/12 16:12:53
                                   no rules were changed, Jeff - pickle MU - 10/12 16:16:36
                                        Your overbearing pride prevents you from being able to learn - JeffB MU - 10/12 16:39:14




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard