so no rules were changed. why did you say they were?
Posted on: October 12, 2020 at 16:00:20 CT
pickle
MU
Posts:
267340
Member For:
26.30 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
“On October 6, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 9–5 to send Bork's nomination to the full Senate with a recommendation that it be rejected. As this negative recommendation made the nomination's ultimate defeat all but certain, Bork's political support fell silent, and it was widely expected that he would withdraw his name from further consideration. However, three days later, Bork announced his belief that:
“There should be a full debate and a final Senate decision.”
And that’s what happened. So why did you say they changed the rules?
Edited by pickle at 16:00:32 on 10/12/20