Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

We need strict constructionists on SCOTUS. If we

Posted on: September 23, 2020 at 09:57:30 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68173
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
have more of obama's lesbian gorillas, they will pass whatever the socialists want.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Expanding SCOTUS and increasing states, requires an - hokie VT - 9/23 09:28:26
     Yes, No, Yes. - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/23 10:53:39
          jesus (nm) - pickle MU - 9/23 11:05:28
               ^^ another insightful post from the board idiot. - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/23 11:09:08
                    two ****ing morons who claim to be constitutionalists - pickle MU - 9/23 11:11:14
                         We’re just waiting for you to do what you always do... - Outsider MU - 9/23 11:24:38
                         Once again, care to rebut my statements or would you prefer - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/23 11:18:06
                              did you ever explain what I misstated? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 9/23 11:23:02
                                   You created a narrative based on your own misconceptions and - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/23 11:33:18
                                        it was based on your posts, so how about - SwampTiger MU - 9/23 11:38:34
                                             he’s incapable (nm) - pickle MU - 9/23 11:39:14
                                        there were no misconceptions (nm) - pickle MU - 9/23 11:35:12
     how is your socialism different from theirs? (nm) - pickle MU - 9/23 09:49:47
          grows a little bit slower? (nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 9/23 09:51:43
     this may help you - tigerinhogtown STL - 9/23 09:38:05
          Thanx. nm - hokie VT - 9/23 09:48:26
               it's scarey(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 9/23 09:55:02
               how about reading the constitution for once? (nm) - pickle MU - 9/23 09:54:46
     Neither require a constitutional amendment. - Spanky KU - 9/23 09:37:31
     number of justices is not in the constitution(nm) - dangertim MU - 9/23 09:35:18
          it’s absolutely mind blowing - pickle MU - 9/23 09:51:34
               we're not lawyers, that's why we need help interpreting from - SwampTiger MU - 9/23 09:56:18
                    RE: we're not lawyers, that's why we need help interpreting from - Panthera MU - 9/23 10:03:55
     Yes, they can do both - Calca STL - 9/23 09:32:02
          DC cannot be a state. The Constitution requires a federally - DHighlander NWMSU - 9/23 10:57:52
          DC is a weird situation - o'lineydisciple MU - 9/23 09:56:03
               We need strict constructionists on SCOTUS. If we - hokie VT - 9/23 09:57:30
                    Why do you think that judges on the Supreme Court - Say_What MU - 9/23 11:00:45
                         Why did you change handles?(nm) - Panthera MU - 9/23 12:28:38
                    lol you don’t even know what’s in the constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 9/23 09:58:33
          God help us if they get power. nm - hokie VT - 9/23 09:37:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard