Welcome Guest

No, it doesn't. The obligation is legal whether you object

Posted on: July 16, 2020 at 12:59:16 CT

SparkyStalcup MU

Posts:

25359

Member For:

13.67 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

to it or not. It is a valid obligation. The only thing that would change the nature of the obligation would be a court judgment, or a voluntary forgiveness or some legal cancellation of debt.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

This is what happens when idiotic thought is allowed - dangertim MU

- 7/16 11:45:59

Sparky has been challenging MBS and rask for awhile - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/16 12:09:09

yeah....I might get to the point that I'm going to - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:11:50

he's been on ignore for a long time (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 12:23:29

Yes. I'm sure your bubble is comfortable.for you nm. - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:30:44

yes, it is, thanks (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 12:37:29

I did notice that their list of millionaires to donate to - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:06:14

did any of them receive covid relief funds? (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:09:22

I doubt it. Did any of those that they choose to list? How - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:11:59

I don't know, which is why I was asking you (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:18:13

So you admit it was a BS question completely unrelated to - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:42:23

no, I asked you a valid question - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:46:45

No you asked a completely random question that had no - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:55:08

random? I don't think that word means what you think it does - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:58:13

pervade (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 11:48:55

british spoelling(nm) - dangertim MU

- 7/16 11:53:37

tori spelling (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 12:08:51

The Onion is a satire site. Yes, I get your poor attempt at - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 11:48:11

satire requires an element of truth. This is a good example - dangertim MU

- 7/16 11:54:54

I wasn't criticizing the Onion article. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 11:55:53

that's because you don't understand the point of the - dangertim MU

- 7/16 11:58:57

I understand it perfectly. I reject your hypothesis. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:00:17

so, tax cuts to corporations means the govt gives - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:01:52

Who else would the $$$ go to? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:06:46

lol wtf are you talking about - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/16 12:13:39

Whose financial position is improved by eliminating an - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:16:59

you said that the government is giving them money, you - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:20:29

Who is removing the obligation? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:22:42

taking less money is not giving people money. - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:34:22

My thinking is what an accountant would think auditing - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:50:42

It's coming from a guy who states that we have little - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:42:25

We do have very little good governance right now. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:51:37

Below you didn't qualify it with "good". (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/16 13:02:01

Innocent omission. I think faster than I type. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 13:09:38

so if you were stealing $100 from me every week and - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 12:34:17

Irrelevant. Taxes are not legal theft. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:54:19

military, government agencies, etc - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:08:51

So if a corporation's obligation is reduced, how does that - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:13:24

so reducing an obligation = giving them money? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/16 12:23:08

Who reduced the obligation? If you owe dangertim - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:26:30

oh dear. - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:35:48

Yes. Please remember that when you post stupid shyte - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:55:07

example?(nm) - dangertim MU

- 7/16 13:04:49

lol wait what? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/16 12:33:23

Both are legal debts. Some of you should learn basic - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 13:00:11

if he owes dangertim $50 - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:30:12

That's where your argument falls apart. You are - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:35:21

It 100% changes the "nature" of the obligation. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:36:03

No, it doesn't. The obligation is legal whether you object - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:59:16

You said two things it does not change: - ummmm MU - 7/16 13:01:41

I actually laughed when I read it - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/16 12:34:20

By his reasoning if I carjack you but allow you to get your - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:45:34

lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/16 12:48:46

It is somewhat relevant to the Onion article, in that you - ummmm MU - 7/16 11:53:14

It is also similar in that both the article and my post - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 11:58:58

We're not talking about the decently wealthy guy - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:04:52

I'm not for big government. Honestly, we have very little - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:09:00

Yes, you are. And yes, we do. We're at a moment - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:30:50

Yes, there is bad governance. I will grant that. There is - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:56:52

if less burdens="favoring" to you, then - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:01:02

Fewer burdens is favorable, yes. That is obvious. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:24:22

And the only way to achieve that is your party taking over. - hefeweizen MU

- 7/16 12:00:13

I don't have a party. Yes, I tend to favor Democrats because - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:05:30

so...dems fall short b/c they fail to be full socialists - dangertim MU

- 7/16 12:07:42

I've never advocated for full government ownership of - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:19:39

You live in MO?(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 7/16 12:06:05

Fair share(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 7/16 11:54:46