 |
|
RE: Here are the softball implications...
Posted on: March 15, 2020 at 18:58:37 CT
Miz4Now MU
Posts:
220
Member For:
5.90 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Yes you're right this seems unmanageable. If the NCAA put a cap on the number of players that can have the year back would be a better solution. 5 to 6 and the rest take move up to what year they should be..
Have to guess 5-6 transfers do to lack of playing time or seeing lack of playing time based on who is coming in.
Though seeing Daniel back would be great.
Does Rollin stay now that she has just the roll of DP?
Does Kessinger stay? There was chatter she was playing like this could be her last year.
Then you have a few pitchers that have may never see an inning of real play time.
I guess we will have months to garden and think about this.
Have to guess 5-6 transfers do to lack of playing time or seeing lack of playing time based on who is coming in.
Though seeing Daniel back would be great.
Does Rollin stay now that she has just the roll of DP?
Does Kessinger stay? There was chatter she was playing like this could be her last year.
Then you have a few pitchers that have may never see an inning of real play time.
I guess we will have months to garden and think about this.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
RE: Here are the softball implications... - Miz4Now MU - 3/15 18:58:37