 |
|
Ahh, the typical smokescreen of insults pickle relies upon
Posted on: March 4, 2020 at 15:36:28 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
70121
Member For:
20.96 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
in his "dialogue".
pickle: "in this particular instance, MBS mischaracterized Rothbard’s beliefs when talking about there should be no obligation to children. he left out the word “legal” before obligation."
As I pointed out in this post: http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791805
Rothbard often leaves out the word "Legal"
https://mises.org/library/children-and-rights
Rothbard: "should a parent have the right to allow a deformed baby to die (e.g., by not feeding it)?4 The answer is of course yes, following a fortiori from the larger right to allow any baby, whether deformed or not, to die."
pickle: For some reason, Jeff jumps in here with something completely different,
I wasn't jumping in with anything different. I was pointing out the ramifications of Rothbard's (& your) beliefs.
pickle: once again not understanding a topic, hence ashtray saying he’s confusing right for obligation.
Interestingly enough, your ally, ashtray had jumped in saying that I was correct in my assessment of what Rothbard was saying:
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791859
ashtray UF: correct!
you finally got one right
shortly after that you contradicted you buddy with your typically absurd stream of insults in lieu of a reasoned, logical response:
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791861
pickle: you are very, very confused, Jeff
and you’re dumber than a ****ing stump
You always fall to the bottom of the logic pyramid.
https://i.imgur.com/PkSEgqy.png
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791861
Edited by JeffB at 15:38:21 on 03/04/20
pickle: "in this particular instance, MBS mischaracterized Rothbard’s beliefs when talking about there should be no obligation to children. he left out the word “legal” before obligation."
As I pointed out in this post: http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791805
Rothbard often leaves out the word "Legal"
https://mises.org/library/children-and-rights
Rothbard: "should a parent have the right to allow a deformed baby to die (e.g., by not feeding it)?4 The answer is of course yes, following a fortiori from the larger right to allow any baby, whether deformed or not, to die."
pickle: For some reason, Jeff jumps in here with something completely different,
I wasn't jumping in with anything different. I was pointing out the ramifications of Rothbard's (& your) beliefs.
pickle: once again not understanding a topic, hence ashtray saying he’s confusing right for obligation.
Interestingly enough, your ally, ashtray had jumped in saying that I was correct in my assessment of what Rothbard was saying:
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791859
ashtray UF: correct!
you finally got one right
shortly after that you contradicted you buddy with your typically absurd stream of insults in lieu of a reasoned, logical response:
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791861
pickle: you are very, very confused, Jeff
and you’re dumber than a ****ing stump
You always fall to the bottom of the logic pyramid.
https://i.imgur.com/PkSEgqy.png
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16791861
Edited by JeffB at 15:38:21 on 03/04/20
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Ahh, the typical smokescreen of insults pickle relies upon - JeffB MU - 3/4 15:36:28