Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I was referring to being on the wrong side of the road

Posted on: March 1, 2020 at 15:23:55 CT
pickle MU
Posts:
267340
Member For:
26.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
but to answer your question someone could accidentally go 100 with a broken speedometer. That’s one possibility

but i don't see the problem with recognizing one doesn't have the facts and can't read another's mind; therefore, it is either intentional or unintentional. the results (ie punishment) will depend on the case.

Edited by pickle at 16:03:59 on 03/01/20
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

a board refresher - pickle MU - 3/1 13:03:55
     a reality refresher. - MizzouTigerz MU - 3/1 15:53:03
          i reject your evil and anti-human code (nm) - pickle MU - 3/1 15:57:25
               RE: i reject your evil and anti-human code: Human nature - BH O'bonga MU - 3/1 16:34:18
               If, as you claim, there is no God, then there is no evil, - MizzouTigerz MU - 3/1 16:12:35
                    no, that is illogical and incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 3/1 17:54:45
                         oh, pickle. You may go. - MizzouTigerz MU - 3/1 23:39:10
                    an absence of God doesn't imply random, doesn't imply - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 16:42:56
                         Your claim that Christianity teaches it is only faith - MizzouTigerz MU - 3/1 17:25:51
                              Oh, and all of that sounds like self-justifying nonsense - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 17:31:01
                              i never said "only". You're clearly incapable of respondi - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 17:30:05
                                   You said There's nothing remotely logical about God. - MizzouTigerz MU - 3/1 17:37:51
                                        There's nothing remotely logical about God (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 18:15:20
                                             iyeo - MizzouTigerz MU - 3/1 19:06:27
     Yes, that’s correct. That’s why i don’t vote - pickle MU - 3/1 15:20:00
          no, that's not correct - pickle MU - 3/1 15:56:35
               We have authoritarian government now - ashtray UF - 3/1 22:14:02
               i'm not following you at all - pickle MU - 3/1 17:52:16
     I can't see how that's threatening to anyone, other than if - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 14:25:02
     So, a libertarian would not want anyone to stop someone - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:06:59
          That’s an odd leap of logic. - pickle MU - 3/1 14:25:03
          A libertarian would support private roads where the owners - TigerMatt STL - 3/1 14:18:39
               And? Even in a private road scenario, the person driving - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:29:15
                    you're an idiot (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 16:43:28
                    yes but they have to follow the rules - meatiger MU - 3/1 16:10:17
                    Depends on if it’s accidental or intentional - pickle MU - 3/1 14:30:55
                         How do you accidently drive 100 MPH? - RHAYWORTH MU - 3/1 15:17:57
                              I was referring to being on the wrong side of the road - pickle MU - 3/1 15:23:55
                         He has not initiated force on anyone - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:33:27
                              property rights implies you can set rules and enforce - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 16:44:12
                              if it were intentional then he did - pickle MU - 3/1 14:37:22
                                   No... failure again for you(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/1 15:42:19
                                        no, that's not a failure on my part. - pickle MU - 3/1 15:58:11
                                             sigh...it is a failure on your part....still(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/1 16:40:11
                                                  no, Spanky. you don't understand property rights (nm) - pickle MU - 3/1 18:05:35
                              The driver would have violated the terms of agreement to - TigerMatt STL - 3/1 14:34:56
                                   how do you stop him from driving at the time of his - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:39:08
                                        PROPERTY RIGHTS, SPANKY (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 16:44:45
                                        he’s on someone’s property - pickle MU - 3/1 14:41:11
                                        How do you stop someone from walking into - TigerMatt STL - 3/1 14:40:08
                                             I have a lock...and can call cops to arrest anyone who - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:41:40
                                                  Sounds like something that could easily be privatized.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 3/1 14:52:12
                                                       Not easilly(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/1 17:22:28
                                                            taking back things from gvmt is hard. that's not an argume - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 18:25:17
               and those rules would, undoubtedly, include rules against - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 14:26:56
                    how do they stop the person since he has not initiated force - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:32:21
                         it's their property, they can enforce their property rights. - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 16:45:42
                              Can they kill the violator? Jail him?(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/1 17:21:53
                                   You never read the piece from yesterday, that much is - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 18:19:40
                         if it were intentional then he did - pickle MU - 3/1 14:39:52
                              If he was accidentally driving 100 mph down - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:43:25
                              It is remarkable but I already see his next argument and - TigerMatt STL - 3/1 14:40:51
                                   Yep (nm) - pickle MU - 3/1 14:41:25
                         Are you aspie? You really struggle to understand basic - TigerMatt STL - 3/1 14:36:48
                              No-one can initiate force on someone who has not - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:40:37
                                   Correct - pickle MU - 3/1 14:41:56
                                        Certainly it is....(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/1 14:43:58
                                             It isn’t in this subthread - pickle MU - 3/1 14:45:01
                                                  No difference in anyone’s mind but you and the struggling - Spanky KU - 3/1 15:05:11
                                                       the person breaking the rules of the property owner is - 90Tiger STL - 3/1 16:47:08
                                                       The only one struggling is you - pickle MU - 3/1 15:16:45
                                                            nope..try again - Spanky KU - 3/1 15:41:23
                                                                 you don't and you never have (nm) - pickle MU - 3/1 15:58:24
                                   Not respecting the property rights of others is initiating - TigerMatt STL - 3/1 14:41:40
     In spite of a doctrine that certainly sounds good and in - GA Tiger MU - 3/1 14:04:16
          it does no such thing, GAT - pickle MU - 3/1 14:26:13
          The military is not currently being used to protect - Newcatbirdseat MU - 3/1 14:14:21
     taxation is theft - pickle MU - 3/1 13:50:00
          No. I’d be killed if I did - pickle MU - 3/1 14:21:21
               of course (nm) - pickle MU - 3/1 14:25:18
                    i don’t understand the question (nm) - pickle MU - 3/1 14:52:29
                         Of course - pickle MU - 3/1 15:05:33
          Sounds more like private health care to me - SparkyStalcup MU - 3/1 13:52:35
               That’s a straw man - pickle MU - 3/1 14:20:32
     Good point sovereign citizen(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 3/1 13:23:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard