Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
RE: Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs
Posted on: February 18, 2020 at 21:27:54 CT
sarasotatiger
MU
Posts:
19016
Member For:
12.05 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Good point. I think that l bs should be safety type
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
We’ve got a bunch of LB’s and no DE’s. Odd fronts?
-
Converted Tiger
MU
-
2/18 15:13:59
TCU made a living out of moving LBs to DE
-
JayHoaxH8r
MU
-
2/19 13:20:48
Question: Do any of our LBs have the size/skills...
-
Deputy Dawg
MU
-
2/19 06:38:33
Good question. I thought at the start of last year that
-
Gamagrass
MU
-
2/19 09:47:25
Daffy Duck Defense? (nm)
-
Fourth and Long
MU
-
2/18 21:44:27
Devine recruited a Fullback to play DE, nm
-
MU-TULSA
MU
-
2/18 19:06:57
Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs
-
Tiger Tank
MU
-
2/18 18:18:53
RE: Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs
-
THEGROVE68
MU
-
2/18 18:52:59
There are lots of possibilities for the linebacker positions
-
alwaysright
MU
-
2/19 07:10:30
RE: Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs
-
sarasotatiger
MU
-
2/18 21:27:54
Personally, I don't care who it is
-
Tiger Tank
MU
-
2/18 19:03:26
Since 3 DB coaches are listed
-
hoosierdaddy
MU
-
2/18 15:40:16
RE: We’ve got a bunch of LB’s and no DE’s. Odd fronts?
-
THEGROVE68
MU
-
2/18 15:34:37
I'd say that's a distinct possibility
-
eatatjoes
MU
-
2/18 15:27:45