Welcome Guest

RE: Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs

Posted on: February 18, 2020 at 21:27:54 CT
sarasotatiger MU
Posts:
19016
Member For:
12.05 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Good point. I think that l bs should be safety type
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     TCU made a living out of moving LBs to DE - JayHoaxH8r MU - 2/19 13:20:48
     Question: Do any of our LBs have the size/skills... - Deputy Dawg MU - 2/19 06:38:33
          Good question. I thought at the start of last year that - Gamagrass MU - 2/19 09:47:25
     Daffy Duck Defense? (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 2/18 21:44:27
     Devine recruited a Fullback to play DE, nm - MU-TULSA MU - 2/18 19:06:57
     Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs - Tiger Tank MU - 2/18 18:18:53
          RE: Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs - THEGROVE68 MU - 2/18 18:52:59
               There are lots of possibilities for the linebacker positions - alwaysright MU - 2/19 07:10:30
               RE: Generally speaking, odd fronts don't require more LBs - sarasotatiger MU - 2/18 21:27:54
               Personally, I don't care who it is - Tiger Tank MU - 2/18 19:03:26
     Since 3 DB coaches are listed - hoosierdaddy MU - 2/18 15:40:16
     RE: We’ve got a bunch of LB’s and no DE’s. Odd fronts? - THEGROVE68 MU - 2/18 15:34:37
     I'd say that's a distinct possibility - eatatjoes MU - 2/18 15:27:45




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard