Welcome Guest

Tell you what - trade you the lot for Trump under oath

Posted on: January 31, 2020 at 10:27:43 CT

raskolnikov MU

Posts:

188057

Member For:

24.78 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

He is the accused. None of the others are or ever will be.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Do dems really want Schiff, WB, bidens testilying? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 09:35:36

No. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 1/31 10:12:27

The answer is the opposite of what rask says. Nm - yy4u MU - 1/31 10:08:15

don't care - put them up with Bolton, Mulvaney, Trump, Rudy - tigerdb MU - 1/31 09:59:35

I second this * - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/31 10:18:59

Uh huh, Yes, Absolutley - here's why - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 09:53:23

Really? WB Schiff Bidens have no relevance? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:01:48

Answer me this Batman - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 10:25:52

That's just propaganda, you're claiming as truth. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:46:19

You are so pathetic - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 11:23:58

sounds like you're moving into the bargaining stage of grief - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:01:29

None of them want to be under oath(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 1/31 09:58:50

Tell you what - trade you the lot for Trump under oath - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 10:27:43

I assume that tortured analogy is an example of your - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/31 09:56:06

RE: I assume that tortured analogy is an example of your - scan MU - 1/31 10:02:14

that's right, b/c the NYT's cleared Biden (nm) - Sal MU

- 1/31 09:55:51

it was The Atlantic (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:04:16

that's right, even better (nm) - Sal MU

- 1/31 10:20:49

So, one of the most biased liberal magazines cleared Joe? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:12:02

rask trusts them - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:15:24

RE: rask trusts them - scan MU - 1/31 10:17:25

No need for any lawyers to get involved then. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:03:12

sounds like you want to cover some stuff up.(nm) - dangertim MU

- 1/31 09:54:52

The most hilarious thing about that is that Schiff would - hefeweizen MU

- 1/31 09:36:50

Excellent point. The Constitution and our laws are there - hokie VT - 1/31 09:51:20

lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:00:32

What grounds would you base his objections on - tman MU - 1/31 09:38:50

That he is a prosecutor in the case and that - Spanky KU - 1/31 09:40:37

I saw it once on Perry Mason(nm) - Floyd Turbo 99 - 1/31 10:07:24

I assume he would argue either standing, immunity or - hefeweizen MU

- 1/31 09:40:22

He would probably have to go with standing or immunity. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 09:49:11

Yep (nm) - Sal MU

- 1/31 09:37:13