Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Uh huh, Yes, Absolutley - here's why

Posted on: January 31, 2020 at 09:53:23 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
it will become apparent IMMEDIATELY that they have NO relevance to the charges and all the fuss the GOP made of them, the focus they got during the trial was smoke and mirrors.

Give me one Bolton and I will give you two bidens. WB is to remain protected. How often is it that the neighbor who calls 911 for the house fire three houses down is called in to the arson trial ? thanks for coming coward.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Do dems really want Schiff, WB, bidens testilying? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 09:35:36
     No. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 1/31 10:12:27
     The answer is the opposite of what rask says. Nm - yy4u MU - 1/31 10:08:15
     don't care - put them up with Bolton, Mulvaney, Trump, Rudy - tigerdb MU - 1/31 09:59:35
          I second this * - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/31 10:18:59
     Uh huh, Yes, Absolutley - here's why - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 09:53:23
          Really? WB Schiff Bidens have no relevance? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:01:48
               Answer me this Batman - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 10:25:52
                    That's just propaganda, you're claiming as truth. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:46:19
                         You are so pathetic - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 11:23:58
          sounds like you're moving into the bargaining stage of grief - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:01:29
          None of them want to be under oath(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 1/31 09:58:50
               Tell you what - trade you the lot for Trump under oath - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 10:27:43
          I assume that tortured analogy is an example of your - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/31 09:56:06
               RE: I assume that tortured analogy is an example of your - scan MU - 1/31 10:02:14
          that's right, b/c the NYT's cleared Biden (nm) - Sal MU - 1/31 09:55:51
               it was The Atlantic (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:04:16
                    that's right, even better (nm) - Sal MU - 1/31 10:20:49
                    So, one of the most biased liberal magazines cleared Joe? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:12:02
                         rask trusts them - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:15:24
                              RE: rask trusts them - scan MU - 1/31 10:17:25
               No need for any lawyers to get involved then. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:03:12
          sounds like you want to cover some stuff up.(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/31 09:54:52
     The most hilarious thing about that is that Schiff would - hefeweizen MU - 1/31 09:36:50
          Excellent point. The Constitution and our laws are there - hokie VT - 1/31 09:51:20
               lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:00:32
          What grounds would you base his objections on - tman MU - 1/31 09:38:50
               That he is a prosecutor in the case and that - Spanky KU - 1/31 09:40:37
                    I saw it once on Perry Mason(nm) - Floyd Turbo 99 - 1/31 10:07:24
               I assume he would argue either standing, immunity or - hefeweizen MU - 1/31 09:40:22
                    He would probably have to go with standing or immunity. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 09:49:11
          Yep (nm) - Sal MU - 1/31 09:37:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard