Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Do dems really want Schiff, WB, bidens testilying?

Posted on: January 31, 2020 at 09:35:36 CT
RHAYWORTH MU
Posts:
47405
Member For:
16.76 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
Because, if new witnesses get called, Schiff WB Bidens will all be forced to the stand.

What a glorious Schiff show that would be.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Do dems really want Schiff, WB, bidens testilying? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 09:35:36
     No. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 1/31 10:12:27
     The answer is the opposite of what rask says. Nm - yy4u MU - 1/31 10:08:15
     don't care - put them up with Bolton, Mulvaney, Trump, Rudy - tigerdb MU - 1/31 09:59:35
          I second this * - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/31 10:18:59
     Uh huh, Yes, Absolutley - here's why - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 09:53:23
          Really? WB Schiff Bidens have no relevance? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:01:48
               Answer me this Batman - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 10:25:52
                    That's just propaganda, you're claiming as truth. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:46:19
                         You are so pathetic - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 11:23:58
          sounds like you're moving into the bargaining stage of grief - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:01:29
          None of them want to be under oath(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 1/31 09:58:50
               Tell you what - trade you the lot for Trump under oath - raskolnikov MU - 1/31 10:27:43
          I assume that tortured analogy is an example of your - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/31 09:56:06
               RE: I assume that tortured analogy is an example of your - scan MU - 1/31 10:02:14
          that's right, b/c the NYT's cleared Biden (nm) - Sal MU - 1/31 09:55:51
               it was The Atlantic (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:04:16
                    that's right, even better (nm) - Sal MU - 1/31 10:20:49
                    So, one of the most biased liberal magazines cleared Joe? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:12:02
                         rask trusts them - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:15:24
                              RE: rask trusts them - scan MU - 1/31 10:17:25
               No need for any lawyers to get involved then. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 10:03:12
          sounds like you want to cover some stuff up.(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/31 09:54:52
     The most hilarious thing about that is that Schiff would - hefeweizen MU - 1/31 09:36:50
          Excellent point. The Constitution and our laws are there - hokie VT - 1/31 09:51:20
               lol (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/31 10:00:32
          What grounds would you base his objections on - tman MU - 1/31 09:38:50
               That he is a prosecutor in the case and that - Spanky KU - 1/31 09:40:37
                    I saw it once on Perry Mason(nm) - Floyd Turbo 99 - 1/31 10:07:24
               I assume he would argue either standing, immunity or - hefeweizen MU - 1/31 09:40:22
                    He would probably have to go with standing or immunity. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/31 09:49:11
          Yep (nm) - Sal MU - 1/31 09:37:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard