 |
|
Frank Haith era is looking a lot better these days
Posted on: January 9, 2020 at 17:10:27 CT
North co-co champs MU
Posts:
14261
Member For:
16.72 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
30-5, 14-4 with Mike Anderson's players
21-11, 11-7 with a mix
23-12, 9-9 with his own
---------------------
76-28, 34-20
Now 102-67 at Tulsa, 54-36 in conference play
Mizzou is 68-98 since he left.
In his last 3 years, Mike Anderson went 77-29, then Haith went 76-28.
Prevailing thought used to be that Haith left us in a lurch and got out before being fired. Maybe.
But why didn't Miami collapse when he left? Why has Tulsa not collapsed?
Kim Anderson won 75% of his games before MU.
Cuonzo went 84-57 in conference from 2010 - 2017 before he went to Mizzou.
And at the best basketball school he's ever coached, he's gone 5-15 in his last 20 conference games.
Anderson bolted for Arkansas and we understood that was where he grew some coaching roots. But it's not where he is from. Not where he was born. Not where he lived. And he didn't go to school there. And he flirted with leaving Mizzou in 2008, 09 and 2010.
He left a 30-win team that nobody wanted to take.
Frank Haith took it. Then after winning 75% of his games, he leaves for Tulsa?
Then Kim Anderson goes from winning 75% to losing 75%
And now Cuonzo is failing too
My point about this rant?
Something is seriously, seriously wrong at Mizzou. Something internally. Something we aren't aware of because the newspapers suck and refuse to do investigative journalism.
Why are good successful coaches leaving as soon as they can?
Why is nobody with a pulse interested in the job?
What is the cancer that needs to be cut out?
Edited by North co-co champs at 17:11:33 on 01/09/20
21-11, 11-7 with a mix
23-12, 9-9 with his own
---------------------
76-28, 34-20
Now 102-67 at Tulsa, 54-36 in conference play
Mizzou is 68-98 since he left.
In his last 3 years, Mike Anderson went 77-29, then Haith went 76-28.
Prevailing thought used to be that Haith left us in a lurch and got out before being fired. Maybe.
But why didn't Miami collapse when he left? Why has Tulsa not collapsed?
Kim Anderson won 75% of his games before MU.
Cuonzo went 84-57 in conference from 2010 - 2017 before he went to Mizzou.
And at the best basketball school he's ever coached, he's gone 5-15 in his last 20 conference games.
Anderson bolted for Arkansas and we understood that was where he grew some coaching roots. But it's not where he is from. Not where he was born. Not where he lived. And he didn't go to school there. And he flirted with leaving Mizzou in 2008, 09 and 2010.
He left a 30-win team that nobody wanted to take.
Frank Haith took it. Then after winning 75% of his games, he leaves for Tulsa?
Then Kim Anderson goes from winning 75% to losing 75%
And now Cuonzo is failing too
My point about this rant?
Something is seriously, seriously wrong at Mizzou. Something internally. Something we aren't aware of because the newspapers suck and refuse to do investigative journalism.
Why are good successful coaches leaving as soon as they can?
Why is nobody with a pulse interested in the job?
What is the cancer that needs to be cut out?
Edited by North co-co champs at 17:11:33 on 01/09/20
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Frank Haith era is looking a lot better these days - North co-co champs MU - 1/9 17:10:27
-