Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It is vague. On both points. Reference the Joint Chiefs of

Posted on: January 5, 2020 at 12:48:49 CT
jonesin
Posts:
20288
Member For:
25.85 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Staff and the National Security Act of 1947. No one (including you or any other argumentative bastards here) knows for sure.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

There is more evidence for impeachment than - ashtray UF - 1/5 11:56:45
     there is from this drone strike, not the laughable Ukraine - 90Tiger STL - 1/5 13:52:46
          No there isn't - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:57:26
     False. - MizzouTigerz MU - 1/5 13:26:07
          non sequitur (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:27:47
     Yep (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:03:35
     That's not true - Sal MU - 1/5 12:02:42
          But that is ok - meatiger MU - 1/5 12:17:59
          What evidence is there? (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:05:38
          It is true - pickle MU - 1/5 12:04:25
               There was plenty of evidence (nm) - Sal MU - 1/5 12:36:16
                    there isn’t a single bit - pickle MU - 1/5 12:38:18
                         You're the one claiming the intel isn't true - Sal MU - 1/5 12:39:07
                              Read this - pickle MU - 1/5 12:42:33
                                   Who made this b1tch an authority? It's her?opinion of what - jonesin - 1/5 12:54:08
                              The burden isn’t on me. (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:41:21
                                   You continually claim that the US is lying - Sal MU - 1/5 12:42:34
                                        The burden isn’t on me here - pickle MU - 1/5 12:44:24
                                             it's been proven to the people who matter. you aren't one of - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:54:10
                                                  LMFAO - pickle MU - 1/5 15:21:46
                                                  A few things can be true at once - Sal MU - 1/5 12:59:21
                                                       3 is false - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:21:13
                    Where is it? (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:36:54
                         It's been laid out plenty on this board - Sal MU - 1/5 12:37:37
                              By who? - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:39:21
                                   This is you being ignorant again - Sal MU - 1/5 12:41:07
                                        I did - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:41:58
                              No, it hasn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:38:39
                                   So who orchestrated the attacks? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/5 12:39:24
                                        i don’t know. what attacks? (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:43:22
               you continue to ignore the evidence presented and it - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:18:34
                    Government propaganda provided by government sources - ummmm MU - 1/5 12:37:53
                         you have no idea if it's propaganda. you and pickle are - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:55:42
                              Straw man (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:26:33
                              Yes, I have a really good idea that is. There's only a - ummmm MU - 1/5 12:57:53
                    there is no evidence at all and none in that article - pickle MU - 1/5 12:21:56
                         there is and as we "discussed " yesterday you choose to - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:31:04
                              RE: there is and as we "discussed " yesterday you choose to - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:33:11
                                   Says who? What’s the evidence? (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:37:35
                              No, blake. There isn’t one bit of evidence at all - pickle MU - 1/5 12:32:12
                                   Yes, Pickle there is. YOU just keep ignoring it. you can say - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:34:17
                                        That’s not evidence, blake - pickle MU - 1/5 12:35:53
                                             you live in a fantasy land and you are the arbiter in the - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:37:40
                                                  what testimony? - pickle MU - 1/5 12:39:25
                                                  That's very thin evidence - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:38:28
                                                       i'm sorry you weren't read into their intel. - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:42:34
                                                            That's another way of saying - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:46:30
                                                                 “Because they said so” is all he has (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:49:11
                                                                      "they" being militia interviewed by Reuters, and YEARS - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:56:49
                                                                           that’s not evidence (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 15:22:12
                                                            I’m sorry you don’t know what evidence is - pickle MU - 1/5 12:45:05
                         Sounds a lot like our legal system. Getting back to the - jonesin - 1/5 12:27:53
                    Pickled cares not for facts or common sense. nm - jonesin - 1/5 12:19:54
                         you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:24:04
                              No, I am making a statement based on accumulated - jonesin - 1/5 12:30:22
                                   So you don't know the facts - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:31:40
                                   then you’re stupid (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:31:24
               It's the CIC's DUTY to act to protect the lives of US - jonesin - 1/5 12:18:10
                    Wrong - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:22:53
                         this was certainly MILITARY intel. SOCOM intel. NOT the - jonesin - 1/5 12:40:28
                              Where do they get their Intel? - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:41:26
                                   Godamn. Are you ignorant? Special Operations Command - jonesin - 1/5 12:57:27
                                        So SOC is trustworthy deep state - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:15:03
                                             They are foot soldiers. They do the dirty work and they - jonesin - 1/5 13:32:51
                                                  Lol - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:40:01
                    No it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:22:17
                         (sigh)* - jonesin - 1/5 12:23:22
                              Read the constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:24:39
                                   I found NO mention of the CIC's duties BESIDES to protect - jonesin - 1/5 12:33:06
                                        That’s not in the constitution - pickle MU - 1/5 12:34:19
                                             It is vague. On both points. Reference the Joint Chiefs of - jonesin - 1/5 12:48:49
                                                  There’s nothing vague about it - pickle MU - 1/5 12:50:47
                                                       RE: There’s nothing vague about it - jonesin - 1/5 13:01:55
                                                            Not only is that false - pickle MU - 1/5 15:23:16
                                                            The embassy was attacked. Congress knew within 48 hours. - jonesin - 1/5 13:03:45
                                        There's your answer - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:34:05
                                             RE: There's your answer - jonesin - 1/5 12:49:33
                                                  Incorrect - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:13:20
                                                       Article two, Section one. - jonesin - 1/5 13:35:09
                                                            Cite the text, please - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:43:52
                                                            It is vague. The establishment of the Joint Chiefs and the - jonesin - 1/5 13:39:25
                                                                 Were those constitutional amendments? - pickle MU - 1/5 15:24:39
                                                                 You don't know - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:44:32
                    What Intel?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/5 12:19:22
                         You and I will never know. We aren't privy unless you have - jonesin - 1/5 12:22:31
                              RE: You and I will never know. We aren't privy unless you have - meatiger MU - 1/5 12:28:40
                                   Not an act of war. Read what I've told Pickled. - jonesin - 1/5 12:34:37
                                        RE: Not an act of war. Read what I've told Pickled. - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:41:39
                                        Assassination is an act of war (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:35:24
                                             RE: Assassination is an act of war (nm) - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:52:59
                                                  This is not example of self-defense - pickle MU - 1/5 15:25:56
                                                  That doesn't apply - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:12:17
                              But you’re certain evidence exists - pickle MU - 1/5 12:25:35
                                   and you're certain it doesn't...b/c the gov't says so. - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:31:57
                                        Yeah, that’s not evidence. So present this evidence - pickle MU - 1/5 12:32:42
                                             The intel was correct in his location. The intel as to what - jonesin - 1/5 12:37:53
                                                  you have no idea what is fact or not - pickle MU - 1/5 12:46:09
                                                  So his being in Baghdad is your evidence? - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:40:25
                                             i've given you reports of interviews with militia members - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:35:49
                                                  That’s not evidence (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:36:28
                              Because it doesn't exist (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:23:33
                                   So who orchestrated the attacks - Sal MU - 1/5 12:36:59
                                        I'm not the one claiming to know. You are (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:37:45
     Did you say impeachment? - Ace AU - 1/5 12:01:44




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard