Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

What evidence is there? (nm)

Posted on: January 5, 2020 at 12:05:38 CT
ashtray UF
Posts:
111045
Member For:
22.65 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

There is more evidence for impeachment than - ashtray UF - 1/5 11:56:45
     there is from this drone strike, not the laughable Ukraine - 90Tiger STL - 1/5 13:52:46
          No there isn't - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:57:26
     False. - MizzouTigerz MU - 1/5 13:26:07
          non sequitur (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:27:47
     Yep (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:03:35
     That's not true - Sal MU - 1/5 12:02:42
          But that is ok - meatiger MU - 1/5 12:17:59
          What evidence is there? (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:05:38
          It is true - pickle MU - 1/5 12:04:25
               There was plenty of evidence (nm) - Sal MU - 1/5 12:36:16
                    there isn’t a single bit - pickle MU - 1/5 12:38:18
                         You're the one claiming the intel isn't true - Sal MU - 1/5 12:39:07
                              Read this - pickle MU - 1/5 12:42:33
                                   Who made this b1tch an authority? It's her?opinion of what - jonesin - 1/5 12:54:08
                              The burden isn’t on me. (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:41:21
                                   You continually claim that the US is lying - Sal MU - 1/5 12:42:34
                                        The burden isn’t on me here - pickle MU - 1/5 12:44:24
                                             it's been proven to the people who matter. you aren't one of - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:54:10
                                                  LMFAO - pickle MU - 1/5 15:21:46
                                                  A few things can be true at once - Sal MU - 1/5 12:59:21
                                                       3 is false - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:21:13
                    Where is it? (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:36:54
                         It's been laid out plenty on this board - Sal MU - 1/5 12:37:37
                              By who? - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:39:21
                                   This is you being ignorant again - Sal MU - 1/5 12:41:07
                                        I did - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:41:58
                              No, it hasn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:38:39
                                   So who orchestrated the attacks? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/5 12:39:24
                                        i don’t know. what attacks? (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:43:22
               you continue to ignore the evidence presented and it - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:18:34
                    Government propaganda provided by government sources - ummmm MU - 1/5 12:37:53
                         you have no idea if it's propaganda. you and pickle are - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:55:42
                              Straw man (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:26:33
                              Yes, I have a really good idea that is. There's only a - ummmm MU - 1/5 12:57:53
                    there is no evidence at all and none in that article - pickle MU - 1/5 12:21:56
                         there is and as we "discussed " yesterday you choose to - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:31:04
                              RE: there is and as we "discussed " yesterday you choose to - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:33:11
                                   Says who? What’s the evidence? (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:37:35
                              No, blake. There isn’t one bit of evidence at all - pickle MU - 1/5 12:32:12
                                   Yes, Pickle there is. YOU just keep ignoring it. you can say - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:34:17
                                        That’s not evidence, blake - pickle MU - 1/5 12:35:53
                                             you live in a fantasy land and you are the arbiter in the - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:37:40
                                                  what testimony? - pickle MU - 1/5 12:39:25
                                                  That's very thin evidence - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:38:28
                                                       i'm sorry you weren't read into their intel. - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:42:34
                                                            That's another way of saying - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:46:30
                                                                 “Because they said so” is all he has (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:49:11
                                                                      "they" being militia interviewed by Reuters, and YEARS - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:56:49
                                                                           that’s not evidence (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 15:22:12
                                                            I’m sorry you don’t know what evidence is - pickle MU - 1/5 12:45:05
                         Sounds a lot like our legal system. Getting back to the - jonesin - 1/5 12:27:53
                    Pickled cares not for facts or common sense. nm - jonesin - 1/5 12:19:54
                         you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:24:04
                              No, I am making a statement based on accumulated - jonesin - 1/5 12:30:22
                                   So you don't know the facts - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:31:40
                                   then you’re stupid (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:31:24
               It's the CIC's DUTY to act to protect the lives of US - jonesin - 1/5 12:18:10
                    Wrong - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:22:53
                         this was certainly MILITARY intel. SOCOM intel. NOT the - jonesin - 1/5 12:40:28
                              Where do they get their Intel? - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:41:26
                                   Godamn. Are you ignorant? Special Operations Command - jonesin - 1/5 12:57:27
                                        So SOC is trustworthy deep state - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:15:03
                                             They are foot soldiers. They do the dirty work and they - jonesin - 1/5 13:32:51
                                                  Lol - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:40:01
                    No it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:22:17
                         (sigh)* - jonesin - 1/5 12:23:22
                              Read the constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:24:39
                                   I found NO mention of the CIC's duties BESIDES to protect - jonesin - 1/5 12:33:06
                                        That’s not in the constitution - pickle MU - 1/5 12:34:19
                                             It is vague. On both points. Reference the Joint Chiefs of - jonesin - 1/5 12:48:49
                                                  There’s nothing vague about it - pickle MU - 1/5 12:50:47
                                                       RE: There’s nothing vague about it - jonesin - 1/5 13:01:55
                                                            Not only is that false - pickle MU - 1/5 15:23:16
                                                            The embassy was attacked. Congress knew within 48 hours. - jonesin - 1/5 13:03:45
                                        There's your answer - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:34:05
                                             RE: There's your answer - jonesin - 1/5 12:49:33
                                                  Incorrect - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:13:20
                                                       Article two, Section one. - jonesin - 1/5 13:35:09
                                                            Cite the text, please - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:43:52
                                                            It is vague. The establishment of the Joint Chiefs and the - jonesin - 1/5 13:39:25
                                                                 Were those constitutional amendments? - pickle MU - 1/5 15:24:39
                                                                 You don't know - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:44:32
                    What Intel?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/5 12:19:22
                         You and I will never know. We aren't privy unless you have - jonesin - 1/5 12:22:31
                              RE: You and I will never know. We aren't privy unless you have - meatiger MU - 1/5 12:28:40
                                   Not an act of war. Read what I've told Pickled. - jonesin - 1/5 12:34:37
                                        RE: Not an act of war. Read what I've told Pickled. - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:41:39
                                        Assassination is an act of war (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:35:24
                                             RE: Assassination is an act of war (nm) - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:52:59
                                                  This is not example of self-defense - pickle MU - 1/5 15:25:56
                                                  That doesn't apply - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:12:17
                              But you’re certain evidence exists - pickle MU - 1/5 12:25:35
                                   and you're certain it doesn't...b/c the gov't says so. - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:31:57
                                        Yeah, that’s not evidence. So present this evidence - pickle MU - 1/5 12:32:42
                                             The intel was correct in his location. The intel as to what - jonesin - 1/5 12:37:53
                                                  you have no idea what is fact or not - pickle MU - 1/5 12:46:09
                                                  So his being in Baghdad is your evidence? - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:40:25
                                             i've given you reports of interviews with militia members - blake1771 MU - 1/5 12:35:49
                                                  That’s not evidence (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 12:36:28
                              Because it doesn't exist (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:23:33
                                   So who orchestrated the attacks - Sal MU - 1/5 12:36:59
                                        I'm not the one claiming to know. You are (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:37:45
     Did you say impeachment? - Ace AU - 1/5 12:01:44




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard