Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The courts would either rule that they have to testify

Posted on: December 10, 2019 at 16:20:27 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
or that they don't. If the courts ruled they did have to testify, and then those individuals still didn't show up, then the democrats could have an obstruction of justice charge. Simply ignoring the initial subpoena, and letting the courts decide isn't obstruction of congress (or illegal). It's odd the dems won't wait it out to see what happens, which means they know they have nothing on Trump.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Nice articles you've got the Ukraine phone call - MUTGR MU - 12/10 15:56:01
     Why were the subpeonas phony - Da_Haze KC - 12/10 16:03:28
          They can use the courts for enforcement - Sal MU - 12/10 16:09:27
               I really wish they would... - Da_Haze KC - 12/10 16:17:18
                    So you were for jailing Holder when he ignored Congressional - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/10 16:20:31
                    The courts would either rule that they have to testify - Sal MU - 12/10 16:20:27
                         Because then the WH would just claim EP - ashtray UF - 12/10 17:27:06
                              No, they already invoked EP which is what the courts - Sal MU - 12/10 18:10:51
                                   I'm just relaying what Schiff explained - ashtray UF - 12/10 18:15:25
     Technically Schiff obstructed congress by not testifying (nm) - Sal MU - 12/10 15:58:52
          I thought Obstruction of congress was a phony charge?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/10 16:02:42
               It is, hence the reason I'm not advocating for anything - Sal MU - 12/10 16:03:46




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard