Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Technically Schiff obstructed congress by not testifying (nm)

Posted on: December 10, 2019 at 15:58:52 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Nice articles you've got the Ukraine phone call - MUTGR MU - 12/10 15:56:01
     Why were the subpeonas phony - Da_Haze KC - 12/10 16:03:28
          They can use the courts for enforcement - Sal MU - 12/10 16:09:27
               I really wish they would... - Da_Haze KC - 12/10 16:17:18
                    So you were for jailing Holder when he ignored Congressional - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/10 16:20:31
                    The courts would either rule that they have to testify - Sal MU - 12/10 16:20:27
                         Because then the WH would just claim EP - ashtray UF - 12/10 17:27:06
                              No, they already invoked EP which is what the courts - Sal MU - 12/10 18:10:51
                                   I'm just relaying what Schiff explained - ashtray UF - 12/10 18:15:25
     Technically Schiff obstructed congress by not testifying (nm) - Sal MU - 12/10 15:58:52
          I thought Obstruction of congress was a phony charge?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/10 16:02:42
               It is, hence the reason I'm not advocating for anything - Sal MU - 12/10 16:03:46




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard