Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

First, it would not be heard this term. The docket is

Posted on: November 4, 2019 at 10:05:13 CT
Ace UNC
Posts:
28902
Member For:
6.01 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
16
generally decided. And it is a state action against a private citizen

DOJ should not be involved
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Another Trump/DOJ court loss - Ace AU - 11/4 09:54:19
     What crime are we looking at?(nm) - tman MU - 11/4 10:41:08
     He'll ignore it. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 11/4 10:17:23
     It will be overturned by SCOTUS - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:00:10
          You hope so anyways - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 10:00:52
               Explain why the 4th Amendment allows NY prosecutors to - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:08:38
                    state crime and state rights - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 11:09:30
                         The 4th Amendment applies to state law also, derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:15:04
                              How was the 4th Amendment Mis-Applied? - Ace AU - 11/4 11:19:51
                                   What is the PROBABLE CAUSE???? - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:33:19
                                        Tax Fraud - Ace AU - 11/4 11:43:43
                                             That is the suspicion. Where is the probable cause - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:53:00
                                                  Judges say its there - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:11:37
                                                       ibid, Derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 12:34:56
                                                            Guess we will see - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:49:23
                                                                 Derp away, Derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 12:50:56
                                                                      You seem triggered - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:52:51
                    As long as we continue to see a public demand through... - JayRoy KC - 11/4 10:22:00
     Doubtful the higher courts take that case(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 09:58:23
          RE: Doubtful the higher courts take that case(nm) - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:12:18
          Why not? - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:03:00
               They have a very heavy docket and this one is too blatantly - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 10:52:27
                    I could see it going either way - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:54:38
                         well the WH is 0-fer so far on this(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 11:14:41
               First, it would not be heard this term. The docket is - Ace AU - 11/4 10:05:13
                    It is a 4th Amendment issue - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:12:47
                         Wrong, Spankee - Ace AU - 11/4 10:13:42
                              Read the Constitution - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:25:33
                                   Ace and Rask believe 'but we really, really want them.' is a - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/4 10:44:32
                                        I can't wait for the claim of Executive Priviledge - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:52:05
                                             The claim will be 'no probable cause' for the prosecutor - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:04:04
                                             Can't wait for you to actually have any indication of a - tman MU - 11/4 11:03:30
                                                  Doesn't the number of years seem like it's awfully long? - Mormad MU - 11/4 11:14:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard