Welcome Guest

Another Trump/DOJ court loss

Posted on: November 4, 2019 at 09:54:19 CT
Ace AU
Posts:
28270
Member For:
5.28 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
99
Nov 4 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's longtime accounting firm must hand over eight years of his tax returns to New York prosecutors, a U.S. appeals court ruled Monday in the latest setback for Trump in his tenacious efforts to keep his finances secret.

The ruling by the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals backed the ability of prosecutors to enforce a subpoena for the returns against accounting firm Mazars LLP. With the Republican president set to appeal, the ruling sets the stage for an expected showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Another Trump/DOJ court loss - Ace A - 11/4 09:54:19
     What crime are we looking at?(nm) - tman MU - 11/4 10:41:08
     He'll ignore it. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 11/4 10:17:23
     It will be overturned by SCOTUS - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:00:10
          You hope so anyways - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 10:00:52
               Explain why the 4th Amendment allows NY prosecutors to - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:08:38
                    state crime and state rights - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 11:09:30
                         The 4th Amendment applies to state law also, derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:15:04
                              How was the 4th Amendment Mis-Applied? - Ace A - 11/4 11:19:51
                                   What is the PROBABLE CAUSE???? - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:33:19
                                        Tax Fraud - Ace A - 11/4 11:43:43
                                             That is the suspicion. Where is the probable cause - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:53:00
                                                  Judges say its there - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:11:37
                                                       ibid, Derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 12:34:56
                                                            Guess we will see - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:49:23
                                                                 Derp away, Derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 12:50:56
                                                                      You seem triggered - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:52:51
                    As long as we continue to see a public demand through... - JayRoy KC - 11/4 10:22:00
     Doubtful the higher courts take that case(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 09:58:23
          RE: Doubtful the higher courts take that case(nm) - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:12:18
          Why not? - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:03:00
               They have a very heavy docket and this one is too blatantly - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 10:52:27
                    I could see it going either way - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:54:38
                         well the WH is 0-fer so far on this(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 11:14:41
               First, it would not be heard this term. The docket is - Ace A - 11/4 10:05:13
                    It is a 4th Amendment issue - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:12:47
                         Wrong, Spankee - Ace A - 11/4 10:13:42
                              Read the Constitution - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:25:33
                                   Ace and Rask believe 'but we really, really want them.' is a - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/4 10:44:32
                                        I can't wait for the claim of Executive Priviledge - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:52:05
                                             The claim will be 'no probable cause' for the prosecutor - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:04:04
                                             Can't wait for you to actually have any indication of a - tman MU - 11/4 11:03:30
                                                  Doesn't the number of years seem like it's awfully long? - Mormad MU - 11/4 11:14:24




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard