Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Why not?

Posted on: November 4, 2019 at 10:03:00 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
54735
Member For:
17.97 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I'd agree that there's no obvious conflict among the various circuits (which would be one reason to grant it). But maybe they deem it to be an issue of big enough importance that they do...
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Another Trump/DOJ court loss - Ace A - 11/4 09:54:19
     What crime are we looking at?(nm) - tman MU - 11/4 10:41:08
     He'll ignore it. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 11/4 10:17:23
     It will be overturned by SCOTUS - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:00:10
          You hope so anyways - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 10:00:52
               Explain why the 4th Amendment allows NY prosecutors to - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:08:38
                    state crime and state rights - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 11:09:30
                         The 4th Amendment applies to state law also, derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:15:04
                              How was the 4th Amendment Mis-Applied? - Ace A - 11/4 11:19:51
                                   What is the PROBABLE CAUSE???? - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:33:19
                                        Tax Fraud - Ace A - 11/4 11:43:43
                                             That is the suspicion. Where is the probable cause - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:53:00
                                                  Judges say its there - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:11:37
                                                       ibid, Derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 12:34:56
                                                            Guess we will see - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:49:23
                                                                 Derp away, Derp-boy - Spanky KU - 11/4 12:50:56
                                                                      You seem triggered - JayHoaxH8r MU - 11/4 12:52:51
                    As long as we continue to see a public demand through... - JayRoy KC - 11/4 10:22:00
     Doubtful the higher courts take that case(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 09:58:23
          RE: Doubtful the higher courts take that case(nm) - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:12:18
          Why not? - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:03:00
               They have a very heavy docket and this one is too blatantly - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 10:52:27
                    I could see it going either way - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:54:38
                         well the WH is 0-fer so far on this(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/4 11:14:41
               First, it would not be heard this term. The docket is - Ace A - 11/4 10:05:13
                    It is a 4th Amendment issue - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:12:47
                         Wrong, Spankee - Ace A - 11/4 10:13:42
                              Read the Constitution - Spanky KU - 11/4 10:25:33
                                   Ace and Rask believe 'but we really, really want them.' is a - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/4 10:44:32
                                        I can't wait for the claim of Executive Priviledge - Mormad MU - 11/4 10:52:05
                                             The claim will be 'no probable cause' for the prosecutor - Spanky KU - 11/4 11:04:04
                                             Can't wait for you to actually have any indication of a - tman MU - 11/4 11:03:30
                                                  Doesn't the number of years seem like it's awfully long? - Mormad MU - 11/4 11:14:24




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard