Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It's really not though, b/c the dems thought

Posted on: October 8, 2019 at 12:11:20 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
they would have something on Trump after the Mueller investigation. They had been promising impeachment for a few years, so they had to move forward with something. To suggest an SC is needed for this Ukraine deal to be comparable to Clinton is silly.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Here is how the Clinton impeachment proceeded - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 11:37:17
     And those where the vote to proceed were denied: - Spanky KU - 10/8 12:08:19
          There have been numerous calls to impeach Trump before this - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:13:23
               and numerous investigations outside of the Mueller one (nm) - Sal MU - 10/8 12:13:52
     It was also the result of an independent counsel - meatiger MU - 10/8 12:06:41
          lol is this a joke?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/8 12:08:28
          lol they had Mueller for two years - Sal MU - 10/8 12:07:23
               But the left REALLY wants to impeach Trump. Do they really - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:12:39
                    I understand that - meatiger MU - 10/8 12:14:59
               I don't disagree with you - meatiger MU - 10/8 12:08:42
                    It's really not though, b/c the dems thought - Sal MU - 10/8 12:11:20
                         RE: It's really not though, b/c the dems thought - meatiger MU - 10/8 12:33:41
     Andrew Johnson also - Spanky KU - 10/8 12:00:12
     Rules of the House have changed and newsflash for Don - raskolnikov MU - 10/8 11:59:38
          what specific rules are you referring to? can you point - Sal MU - 10/8 12:01:41
               2015, GOP changed the house rules - tigerdb MU - 10/8 12:13:53
                    Nothing to do with impeachment. Subpoenas still have to - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:20:21
                         Ignoring subpoenas (or directing individuals to) - tack - tigerdb MU - 10/8 12:24:31
                              The Executive branch has been ignoring congressional - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:51:35
               Of course he can't - Spanky KU - 10/8 12:08:57
          Sorry, the American people do not buy sudden rule changes - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:01:33
     Nixon also - Spanky KU - 10/8 11:57:23
          Yeah, I just did not research that one. I knew it was a - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 11:58:14
     You omitted about 4 years of investigations - tigerdb MU - 10/8 11:51:47
          They voted to start and impeachment inquiry and after - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 11:55:43
               House rules changed. No longer require the vote to inquire(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/8 12:00:37
                    Link to the vote on this rule change? Or does Nancy get to - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:02:28
                         There was never a requirement for congress to vote in order - tigerdb MU - 10/8 12:10:50
                              And yet historically every time impeachment has been tried - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:17:10
                                   It started with a vote because the minority vote was needed - tigerdb MU - 10/8 12:20:02
                                        If those subpoenas are related to an investigation that does - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:23:28
                                             What the hell are you talking about? There is an ongoing - tigerdb MU - 10/8 12:25:20
                                                  There is no impeachment inquiry. A couple of committee - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 12:54:17
                                                       The SPEAKER of the house has announced an impeachment - tigerdb MU - 10/8 13:12:53
                                                            NOT UNTIL THE HOUSE VOTES. The Speaker is NOT the - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 13:52:33
                                                                 By the way rules on subpoenas have nothing to do with - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 13:56:24
                                                                      LOL...you are as dumb as sal. - tigerdb MU - 10/8 14:05:45
               The dems have been crying impeachment since Trump was - Sal MU - 10/8 11:56:35
          that Mueller report though (nm) - Sal MU - 10/8 11:52:40
     They've painted themselves into a corner - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/8 11:42:44
          Why do you think they need by file articles by yr-end - raskolnikov MU - 10/8 12:01:38
     RE: Here is how the Clinton impeachment proceeded - MrBlueSky MU - 10/8 11:41:16
          You think this is different? At least the GOP back in '98 - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 11:50:10
               Patience, grasshopper(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 10/8 11:51:54
                    Really three years of investigations and nothing from them - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/8 11:57:30




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard