Welcome Guest

Biden did

Posted on: October 3, 2019 at 12:53:54 CT

ashtray UF

Posts:

111045

Member For:

22.61 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Trump did not

The reasons for threatening that aid makes all the difference, Sal. I'm not sure why you don't understand that.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Trump asking China to investigate.... - Gyro MU - 10/3 12:31:21

China: after our investigation we have concluded - JG A - 10/3 13:20:15

Trump didn't have to follow laws or protocal to run - Iam4Mizzou MU

- 10/3 12:59:46

lol what law did that break? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/3 13:01:11

No Hes force feeding America the Corruption, Getting them - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:33:46

It's happening! (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/3 12:35:33

Getting real close Lyin Jack - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:36:35

Trump to declare martial law? - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/3 12:37:17

No, The Tribunals will Xpedite the cases so they arent tied - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:39:20

but under what provision of law do non-military cases get - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/3 12:45:27

RE: but under what provision of law do non-military cases get - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:54:53

RE: Trump asking China to investigate.... - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:33:21

RE: Trump asking China to investigate.... - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:41:03

I have zero issue with looking into that - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:50:46

I'm sure she received those solely because of her - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:51:49

But we can't look into a WB report about the President - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/3 12:51:47

Does it take a fake impeachment inquiry to investigate - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:53:40

with the stonewalling that this administration - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:57:33

They literally released documents they didn't - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:59:01

because they had the force of Obstructing Congress behind - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:00:48

No, the DNI had already deemed the WB complaint - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:03:50

of course they did.. - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:09:04

What, specifically, do you disagree with - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:22:37

the statutory construction analysis is wrong. - gmmm98 MU

- 10/3 15:03:17

specifically, - gmmm98 MU

- 10/3 15:21:49

though i think it was the olc memo and not maguire - gmmm98 MU

- 10/3 15:08:05

His assessment of what? - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:26:52

Yes (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:28:33

I haven't seen it - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:42:25

so if anything good comes out of Trump's impeachement - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:37:21

What did trump specifically promise Zelensky - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:38:52

it isn't what he promised... - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:45:10

He wanted Ukraine's cooperation into a DOJ - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:52:19

Biden did - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:53:54

lol you're being either dishonest or dumb (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:54:26

I think you're describing yourself right now - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:56:12

And what did Trump say after he asked for a favor? - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:48:56

for Zelenskyy to find out what happened with Crowdstrike... - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:52:47

So you admit he wasn't referring to Biden, got it (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:54:06

he did - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:55:32

There is no evidence Trump threatened to withhold - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:57:57

You'll never convince Sal that any of this was wrong(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:45:39

because Obama's name isn't behind it - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:46:31

His favorite thing is to call others partisan hacks - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:47:05

Zelensky asked about ordering more javelins - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:42:37

And Trump then discussed Ukraine interference - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:47:12

If the transcript is accurate he basically cut Zelensky - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:49:01

LOL now it's "he cut him off" - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:49:35

Keep fishing, Sal (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:50:13

So you admit Trump was specifically - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:51:11

Of course, the GOP, the "rule of law" party, don't really - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/3 12:32:57