Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

but under what provision of law do non-military cases get

Posted on: October 3, 2019 at 12:45:27 CT
TigerJackSwartz MU
Posts:
64229
Member For:
17.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
referred to military tribunals? How does that work without declaration of martial law?

If that a CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE of which I'm not aware?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Trump asking China to investigate.... - Gyro MU - 10/3 12:31:21
     China: after our investigation we have concluded - JG A - 10/3 13:20:15
     Trump didn't have to follow laws or protocal to run - Iam4Mizzou MU - 10/3 12:59:46
          lol what law did that break? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/3 13:01:11
     No Hes force feeding America the Corruption, Getting them - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:33:46
          It's happening! (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:35:33
               Getting real close Lyin Jack - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:36:35
                    Trump to declare martial law? - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:37:17
                         No, The Tribunals will Xpedite the cases so they arent tied - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:39:20
                              but under what provision of law do non-military cases get - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:45:27
                                   RE: but under what provision of law do non-military cases get - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:54:53
     RE: Trump asking China to investigate.... - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:33:21
          RE: Trump asking China to investigate.... - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:41:03
               I have zero issue with looking into that - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:50:46
                    I'm sure she received those solely because of her - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:51:49
                    But we can't look into a WB report about the President - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:51:47
                         Does it take a fake impeachment inquiry to investigate - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:53:40
                              with the stonewalling that this administration - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:57:33
                                   They literally released documents they didn't - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:59:01
                                        because they had the force of Obstructing Congress behind - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:00:48
                                             No, the DNI had already deemed the WB complaint - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:03:50
                                                  of course they did.. - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:09:04
                                                       What, specifically, do you disagree with - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:22:37
                                                            the statutory construction analysis is wrong. - gmmm98 MU - 10/3 15:03:17
                                                                 specifically, - gmmm98 MU - 10/3 15:21:49
                                                                 though i think it was the olc memo and not maguire - gmmm98 MU - 10/3 15:08:05
                                                            His assessment of what? - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:26:52
                                                                 Yes (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:28:33
                                                                      I haven't seen it - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:42:25
          so if anything good comes out of Trump's impeachement - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:37:21
               What did trump specifically promise Zelensky - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:38:52
                    it isn't what he promised... - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:45:10
                         He wanted Ukraine's cooperation into a DOJ - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:52:19
                              Biden did - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:53:54
                                   lol you're being either dishonest or dumb (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:54:26
                                        I think you're describing yourself right now - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:56:12
                         And what did Trump say after he asked for a favor? - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:48:56
                              for Zelenskyy to find out what happened with Crowdstrike... - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:52:47
                                   So you admit he wasn't referring to Biden, got it (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:54:06
                                        he did - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:55:32
                                             There is no evidence Trump threatened to withhold - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:57:57
                         You'll never convince Sal that any of this was wrong(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:45:39
                              because Obama's name isn't behind it - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:46:31
                                   His favorite thing is to call others partisan hacks - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:47:05
                    Zelensky asked about ordering more javelins - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:42:37
                         And Trump then discussed Ukraine interference - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:47:12
                              If the transcript is accurate he basically cut Zelensky - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:49:01
                                   LOL now it's "he cut him off" - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:49:35
                                        Keep fishing, Sal (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:50:13
                                             So you admit Trump was specifically - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:51:11
     Of course, the GOP, the "rule of law" party, don't really - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:32:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard