Welcome Guest

for Zelenskyy to find out what happened with Crowdstrike...

Posted on: October 3, 2019 at 12:52:47 CT
ashtray UF
Posts:
111045
Member For:
22.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible."

Then he goes on to say..

"Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."

If he would have left that part out, he's probably in the clear.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Trump asking China to investigate.... - Gyro MU - 10/3 12:31:21
     China: after our investigation we have concluded - JG A - 10/3 13:20:15
     Trump didn't have to follow laws or protocal to run - Iam4Mizzou MU - 10/3 12:59:46
          lol what law did that break? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/3 13:01:11
     No Hes force feeding America the Corruption, Getting them - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:33:46
          It's happening! (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:35:33
               Getting real close Lyin Jack - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:36:35
                    Trump to declare martial law? - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:37:17
                         No, The Tribunals will Xpedite the cases so they arent tied - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:39:20
                              but under what provision of law do non-military cases get - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:45:27
                                   RE: but under what provision of law do non-military cases get - Uncle Fester USMC - 10/3 12:54:53
     RE: Trump asking China to investigate.... - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:33:21
          RE: Trump asking China to investigate.... - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:41:03
               I have zero issue with looking into that - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:50:46
                    I'm sure she received those solely because of her - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:51:49
                    But we can't look into a WB report about the President - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:51:47
                         Does it take a fake impeachment inquiry to investigate - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:53:40
                              with the stonewalling that this administration - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:57:33
                                   They literally released documents they didn't - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:59:01
                                        because they had the force of Obstructing Congress behind - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:00:48
                                             No, the DNI had already deemed the WB complaint - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:03:50
                                                  of course they did.. - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:09:04
                                                       What, specifically, do you disagree with - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:22:37
                                                            the statutory construction analysis is wrong. - gmmm98 MU - 10/3 15:03:17
                                                                 specifically, - gmmm98 MU - 10/3 15:21:49
                                                                 though i think it was the olc memo and not maguire - gmmm98 MU - 10/3 15:08:05
                                                            His assessment of what? - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:26:52
                                                                 Yes (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 13:28:33
                                                                      I haven't seen it - ashtray UF - 10/3 13:42:25
          so if anything good comes out of Trump's impeachement - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:37:21
               What did trump specifically promise Zelensky - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:38:52
                    it isn't what he promised... - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:45:10
                         He wanted Ukraine's cooperation into a DOJ - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:52:19
                              Biden did - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:53:54
                                   lol you're being either dishonest or dumb (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:54:26
                                        I think you're describing yourself right now - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:56:12
                         And what did Trump say after he asked for a favor? - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:48:56
                              for Zelenskyy to find out what happened with Crowdstrike... - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:52:47
                                   So you admit he wasn't referring to Biden, got it (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:54:06
                                        he did - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:55:32
                                             There is no evidence Trump threatened to withhold - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:57:57
                         You'll never convince Sal that any of this was wrong(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:45:39
                              because Obama's name isn't behind it - ashtray UF - 10/3 12:46:31
                                   His favorite thing is to call others partisan hacks - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:47:05
                    Zelensky asked about ordering more javelins - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:42:37
                         And Trump then discussed Ukraine interference - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:47:12
                              If the transcript is accurate he basically cut Zelensky - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:49:01
                                   LOL now it's "he cut him off" - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:49:35
                                        Keep fishing, Sal (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/3 12:50:13
                                             So you admit Trump was specifically - Sal CMSU - 10/3 12:51:11
     Of course, the GOP, the "rule of law" party, don't really - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/3 12:32:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard