Welcome Guest

But… Did it specifically and emphatically deny executive

Posted on: September 26, 2019 at 09:15:52 CT

hokie VT

Posts:

68171

Member For:

9.66 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

privilege?

Barring that, the issue has not been, “exonerated” and the investigation must continue. And even greater speed, greater expense and greater depth.

We must create, I mean, we must get to the bottom of this.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I believe Maguire acted honorably - Ace AU - 9/26 09:10:48

The transcript was released and no claim of Exec Privilege - Spanky KU - 9/26 09:13:00

WH Legal Counsel & DOJ OLC said it was subject to - Ace AU - 9/26 09:29:28

Why not the transcript of the actual call? (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 9/26 09:41:01

It was never asserted - Spanky KU - 9/26 09:37:01

Maguire testified that it was by the two actors he consulted - Ace AU - 9/26 09:41:59

But not the transcript of the actual call (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 9/26 09:42:41

The issue is the ICIG’s report not being sent to Congress - Ace AU - 9/26 09:54:52

It's not a whatabout - mizzouSECedes STL - 9/26 10:13:14

There are actually 2 issues - Mormad MU - 9/26 10:28:46

But… Did it specifically and emphatically deny executive - hokie VT - 9/26 09:15:52

whoops (nm) - Sal CMSU - 9/26 09:13:26

Your legal brilliance is outstanding - mu7176grad MU - 9/26 09:12:25

Go back to making your money - Ace AU - 9/26 09:31:40