Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

It addressed three issues with coming

Posted on: April 26, 2019 at 11:54:45 CT

Sal CMSU

Posts:

229171

Member For:

21.98 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

to a conclusion about Obstruction:

"The Mueller report cites three problems with drawing a conclusion on obstruction: the president’s constitutional authority, the lack of sufficient evidence that Trump committed a crime related to Russian election interference that he would want to cover up and the fact that some of his actions took place in public view. Trump’s lawyers argue the president cannot commit obstruction, though Mueller’s team suggested it does not agree."

The argument about whether or not a sitting President can be indicted was not the only reason Mueller's team didn't charge Trump with obstruction.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/18/heres-why-special-counsel-robert-mueller-did-not-say-whether-trump-obstructed-justice.html

Edited by Sal at 11:54:53 on 04/26/19

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Everyone here understands that Trump broke the law - limenats MU - 4/26 11:05:54

Even JG would say "no" - MIZ45 MU - 4/26 14:32:19

No, I don't understand how one can obstruct when there is no - DoltfromSTL MU - 4/26 12:55:21

there isn't much you do understand(nm) - JG MU

- 4/26 14:28:47

Obstructing an investigation is obstructing justice - raskolnikov MU - 4/26 13:29:02

Martha Stewart says hi. - limenats MU - 4/26 13:01:21

incorrect - FootballRefugee MU

- 4/26 13:50:13

You might want to look that up. - limenats MU - 4/26 13:54:42

I have, son - FootballRefugee MU

- 4/26 15:08:10

And his obstructions would be what exactly. You - GA Tiger MU - 4/26 12:14:17

There are quite a few idiots who believe that - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/26 11:36:53

It's not even debatable - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/26 11:32:12

If it wasn't debatable, Mueller wouldn't have - Sal KC - 4/26 11:33:25

No one was going to charge the - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/26 11:43:47

Mueller put forth legal theories of obstruction - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/26 12:05:00

correct, I'm not sure how they aren't getting this (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 12:06:40

Because they are barely literate morons(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 4/26 12:06:59

They also couldn't find conclusive - Sal KC - 4/26 11:56:59

Mueller doesnt have the ability to indict a sitting Pres.(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 11:34:29

That alone wasn't the sole reason Mueller - Sal KC - 4/26 11:36:08

He directly referenced that, lol - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 11:47:59

"sole reason" - Sal KC - 4/26 11:52:21

Investigating =/= indicting - Badird MU - 4/26 11:53:36

That debate was not the sole reason - Sal KC - 4/26 11:56:33

Seems it was, but believe what you think(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/26 11:43:05

The way I read it, it was.(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 11:36:52

It addressed three issues with coming - Sal KC - 4/26 11:54:45

And you agree with all of that? - Badird MU - 4/26 12:01:02

Do I believe those are the three areas - Sal KC - 4/26 12:08:20

Apparently Mueller report shows collusion too - raskolnikov MU - 4/26 11:23:29

no. it exposes the hoax and lie that reasonable people - pickle MU

- 4/26 11:34:41

OFC it does! It does not prove conspiracy, however.(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 11:31:15

I love the shift of narrative from collusion - Sal KC - 4/26 11:32:49

They have always been the same, to collude is to conspire(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 4/26 11:35:18

lol JFC (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 11:36:59

RE: lol JFC (nm) - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 4/26 12:42:36

True or false: Trump's campaign met with Russians - Badird MU - 4/26 11:34:01

Yes and using that baseline - Sal KC - 4/26 11:36:51

RE: Yes and using that baseline - Badird MU - 4/26 11:37:15

HRC's campaign worked with a former - Sal KC - 4/26 11:42:24

Clinton's law firm hired Fusion GPS, who hired Steele. - Badird MU - 4/26 11:44:57

Steele literally worked with Russian - Sal KC - 4/26 11:46:31

It would literally not be possible to get oppo research - Badird MU - 4/26 11:49:31

Lol (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 11:56:20

This really shows how you both are partisan hacks - Sal KC - 4/26 11:57:39

LMFAO ... so it's OK for one side - Sal KC - 4/26 11:56:03

You are grasping for straws(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 11:57:43

Not at all. You are claiming it's OK to get - Sal KC - 4/26 11:58:51

You have to be kidding me. - Badird MU - 4/26 12:02:38

Here you go... - Sal KC - 4/26 12:03:45

Dude...it's not the same thing. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 12:07:20

Of course they aren't in your eyes - Sal KC - 4/26 12:09:53

Here's the difference: - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 12:12:38

I literally said you all believe it's OK to hire - Sal KC - 4/26 12:17:09

Asking questions is not the same as attending a meeting - Badird MU - 4/26 12:19:11

"asking questions" lmfao (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 12:26:23

This conversation is over, you admitted that Trump colluded. - Badird MU - 4/26 12:30:19

THEY ARENT THE SAME THING. - Badird MU - 4/26 12:05:56

From your post... - Sal KC - 4/26 12:09:40

You have proven yourself a clown.(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 12:10:12

Sal calling anyone else a partisan hack is complete comedy(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 12:14:59

Hes 100% a partisan hack and admitted Trump's camp colluded(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 12:21:48

No, I stated the Trump team met with - Sal KC - 4/26 12:27:46

How many meetings did Clinton campaign officials - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 12:36:14

Neither is illegal, apparently. But you admitted collusion(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 12:31:15

No I admitted Trump's campaign - Sal KC - 4/26 12:36:07

Link? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 12:38:31

lol (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 11:30:19

The laugher here is there never was any proof that Trump... - JayRoy KC - 4/26 11:20:41

Yeah, then why did they all lie about it - raskolnikov MU - 4/26 11:25:07

Define the lie and the context in which this lie... - JayRoy KC - 4/26 11:37:32

Hey ras....where you go boy?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 4/26 12:15:58

Id encourage you to read the 125+ contacts that the Trump - Badird MU - 4/26 11:22:48

I wonder how many foreign entities Obama came in... - JayRoy KC - 4/26 11:34:26

WHATABOUT OBAMA THO!(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 11:38:03

Not surprising you chose to miss the whole point. - JayRoy KC - 4/26 11:43:56

No, you did. - Badird MU - 4/26 11:45:56

What makes Trumps contacts with Russia any more... - JayRoy KC - 4/26 11:53:10

Did any previous admin lie about each and every contact? - Badird MU - 4/26 11:56:08

Lie or not, previous administrations were never... - JayRoy KC - 4/26 12:16:15

So no to all, then?(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 12:17:32

It’s OK, I’d be embarrassed too had I... - JayRoy KC - 4/26 12:24:10

lol NONE of your examples come close to what I wrote. - Badird MU - 4/26 12:25:33

You lost me when you came to the conclusion... - JayRoy KC - 4/26 12:38:06

No to all of the questions I asked. FFS(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 12:40:02

You mean treason? Hang him! nm - hokie VT - 4/26 11:10:45

What we understand is that you are a hopeless ProgTard. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 4/26 11:09:56

Nope. You don't understand a prosecutors role(nm) - tman MU - 4/26 11:09:34

No, he attempted to and was unsuccessful. Is that also - hefeweizen MU

- 4/26 11:09:28

he didn't even attempt. he could have fired the entire SC - blake1771 KC - 4/26 11:14:37

He gave direct orders to WH counsel to fire Mueller - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 11:23:16

LOL he tried to. His subordinates didnt carry out his order. - Badird MU - 4/26 11:21:12

smh. point to the specific act and show me the - blake1771 KC - 4/26 11:08:24

There are a number of statutes for obstruction, but corrupt - Mo Texan MU - 4/26 11:41:00

Check out what your Fox News has to say about it: - Badird MU - 4/26 11:10:37

1st of all i want YOU in your own words to show me - blake1771 KC - 4/26 11:12:40

OH NO! I ignored your whatabout HRC?! - Badird MU - 4/26 11:13:20

RE: OH NO! I ignored your whatabout HRC?! - scan MU - 4/26 11:21:32

Why won't the Trump DOJ - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 11:27:19

No, I dont give a **** about HRC. Id be just as happy to see - Badird MU - 4/26 11:23:50

RE: No, I dont give a **** about HRC. Id be just as happy to see - scan MU - 4/26 11:26:02

You missed the point. This conversation is NOT about HRC. - Badird MU - 4/26 11:29:20

RE: You missed the point. This conversation is NOT about HRC. - scan MU - 4/26 11:31:03

I have never liked HRC or defended her. - Badird MU - 4/26 11:33:13

you ignored my entire post but replied to it twice. fail. - blake1771 KC - 4/26 11:15:15

I ignored the "But whatabout HRC!" bc its your only defense. - Badird MU - 4/26 11:20:29

i asked you to very simply, cite the action the statute and - blake1771 KC - 4/26 11:22:26

It's what he does best (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 11:15:38

You don't have an original thought? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 11:14:28

I dont have time to hold your hands thru what is already - Badird MU - 4/26 11:19:20

There is no proof of intent - Sal KC - 4/26 11:23:38

Id argue there is. The same question as before: - Badird MU - 4/26 11:28:02

You apparently have no idea what intent means (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 11:29:14

His intent is to quell the investigation..... which is - Badird MU - 4/26 11:30:23

You have no proof of that - Sal KC - 4/26 11:31:40

IMO let a jury decide. There is no viable alternative motive - Badird MU - 4/26 11:35:01

That makes zero sense (nm) - Sal KC - 4/26 12:00:16

Well, it actually does.(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 12:03:57

Mueller couldn't find sufficient evidence - Sal KC - 4/26 12:12:09

Yes, take it to Congress.(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 12:16:32

How do you jump from a jury - Sal KC - 4/26 15:04:06

Your inability to think even a single step forward suggests - Badird MU - 4/26 16:04:36

Do you disagree with this, Sal?(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 11:52:15

Lol god damn you're a total ****ing shill(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/26 11:24:57

Provide the evidence - Sal KC - 4/26 11:27:49

on a side note Sal, going to P"ville Beerfest tomorrow if - blake1771 KC - 4/26 11:16:35

Yes.(nm) - Badird MU - 4/26 11:06:21

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard