Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
Do you disagree with this, Sal?(nm)
Posted on: April 26, 2019 at 11:52:15 CT
Badird
MU
Posts:
8826
Member For:
9.60 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
Everyone here understands that Trump broke the law
-
limenats
MU
-
4/26 11:05:54
Even JG would say "no"
-
MIZ45
MU
-
4/26 14:32:19
No, I don't understand how one can obstruct when there is no
-
DoltfromSTL
MU
-
4/26 12:55:21
there isn't much you do understand(nm)
-
JG
MU
-
4/26 14:28:47
Obstructing an investigation is obstructing justice
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
4/26 13:29:02
Martha Stewart says hi.
-
limenats
MU
-
4/26 13:01:21
incorrect
-
FootballRefugee
MU
-
4/26 13:50:13
You might want to look that up.
-
limenats
MU
-
4/26 13:54:42
I have, son
-
FootballRefugee
MU
-
4/26 15:08:10
And his obstructions would be what exactly. You
-
GA Tiger
MU
-
4/26 12:14:17
There are quite a few idiots who believe that
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
4/26 11:36:53
It's not even debatable
-
mizzoumurfkc
KC
-
4/26 11:32:12
If it wasn't debatable, Mueller wouldn't have
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:33:25
No one was going to charge the
-
mizzoumurfkc
KC
-
4/26 11:43:47
Mueller put forth legal theories of obstruction
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
4/26 12:05:00
correct, I'm not sure how they aren't getting this (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:06:40
Because they are barely literate morons(nm)
-
Ragnar Danneskjold
MU
-
4/26 12:06:59
They also couldn't find conclusive
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:56:59
Mueller doesnt have the ability to indict a sitting Pres.(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:34:29
That alone wasn't the sole reason Mueller
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:36:08
He directly referenced that, lol
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 11:47:59
"sole reason"
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:52:21
Investigating =/= indicting
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:53:36
That debate was not the sole reason
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:56:33
Seems it was, but believe what you think(nm)
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
4/26 11:43:05
The way I read it, it was.(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:36:52
It addressed three issues with coming
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:54:45
And you agree with all of that?
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:01:02
Do I believe those are the three areas
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:08:20
Apparently Mueller report shows collusion too
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
4/26 11:23:29
no. it exposes the hoax and lie that reasonable people
-
pickle
MU
-
4/26 11:34:41
OFC it does! It does not prove conspiracy, however.(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:31:15
I love the shift of narrative from collusion
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:32:49
They have always been the same, to collude is to conspire(nm)
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
4/26 11:35:18
lol JFC (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:36:59
RE: lol JFC (nm)
-
JayHoaxH8r
MU
-
4/26 12:42:36
True or false: Trump's campaign met with Russians
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:34:01
Yes and using that baseline
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:36:51
RE: Yes and using that baseline
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:37:15
HRC's campaign worked with a former
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:42:24
Clinton's law firm hired Fusion GPS, who hired Steele.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:44:57
Steele literally worked with Russian
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:46:31
It would literally not be possible to get oppo research
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:49:31
Lol (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 11:56:20
This really shows how you both are partisan hacks
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:57:39
LMFAO ... so it's OK for one side
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:56:03
You are grasping for straws(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:57:43
Not at all. You are claiming it's OK to get
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:58:51
You have to be kidding me.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:02:38
Here you go...
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:03:45
Dude...it's not the same thing. (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 12:07:20
Of course they aren't in your eyes
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:09:53
Here's the difference:
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 12:12:38
I literally said you all believe it's OK to hire
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:17:09
Asking questions is not the same as attending a meeting
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:19:11
"asking questions" lmfao (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:26:23
This conversation is over, you admitted that Trump colluded.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:30:19
THEY ARENT THE SAME THING.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:05:56
From your post...
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:09:40
You have proven yourself a clown.(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:10:12
Sal calling anyone else a partisan hack is complete comedy(nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 12:14:59
Hes 100% a partisan hack and admitted Trump's camp colluded(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:21:48
No, I stated the Trump team met with
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:27:46
How many meetings did Clinton campaign officials
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 12:36:14
Neither is illegal, apparently. But you admitted collusion(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:31:15
No I admitted Trump's campaign
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:36:07
Link? (nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 12:38:31
lol (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:30:19
The laugher here is there never was any proof that Trump...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 11:20:41
Yeah, then why did they all lie about it
-
raskolnikov
MU
-
4/26 11:25:07
Define the lie and the context in which this lie...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 11:37:32
Hey ras....where you go boy?(nm)
-
GA Tiger
MU
-
4/26 12:15:58
Id encourage you to read the 125+ contacts that the Trump
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:22:48
I wonder how many foreign entities Obama came in...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 11:34:26
WHATABOUT OBAMA THO!(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:38:03
Not surprising you chose to miss the whole point.
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 11:43:56
No, you did.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:45:56
What makes Trumps contacts with Russia any more...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 11:53:10
Did any previous admin lie about each and every contact?
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:56:08
Lie or not, previous administrations were never...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 12:16:15
So no to all, then?(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:17:32
It’s OK, I’d be embarrassed too had I...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 12:24:10
lol NONE of your examples come close to what I wrote.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:25:33
You lost me when you came to the conclusion...
-
JayRoy
KC
-
4/26 12:38:06
No to all of the questions I asked. FFS(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:40:02
You mean treason? Hang him! nm
-
hokie
VT
-
4/26 11:10:45
What we understand is that you are a hopeless ProgTard.
-
RayKinsella1922
SEC
-
4/26 11:09:56
Nope. You don't understand a prosecutors role(nm)
-
tman
MU
-
4/26 11:09:34
No, he attempted to and was unsuccessful. Is that also
-
hefeweizen
MU
-
4/26 11:09:28
he didn't even attempt. he could have fired the entire SC
-
blake1771
KC
-
4/26 11:14:37
He gave direct orders to WH counsel to fire Mueller
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 11:23:16
LOL he tried to. His subordinates didnt carry out his order.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:21:12
smh. point to the specific act and show me the
-
blake1771
KC
-
4/26 11:08:24
There are a number of statutes for obstruction, but corrupt
-
Mo Texan
MU
-
4/26 11:41:00
Check out what your Fox News has to say about it:
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:10:37
1st of all i want YOU in your own words to show me
-
blake1771
KC
-
4/26 11:12:40
OH NO! I ignored your whatabout HRC?!
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:13:20
RE: OH NO! I ignored your whatabout HRC?!
-
scan
MU
-
4/26 11:21:32
Why won't the Trump DOJ
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 11:27:19
No, I dont give a **** about HRC. Id be just as happy to see
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:23:50
RE: No, I dont give a **** about HRC. Id be just as happy to see
-
scan
MU
-
4/26 11:26:02
You missed the point. This conversation is NOT about HRC.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:29:20
RE: You missed the point. This conversation is NOT about HRC.
-
scan
MU
-
4/26 11:31:03
I have never liked HRC or defended her.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:33:13
you ignored my entire post but replied to it twice. fail.
-
blake1771
KC
-
4/26 11:15:15
I ignored the "But whatabout HRC!" bc its your only defense.
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:20:29
i asked you to very simply, cite the action the statute and
-
blake1771
KC
-
4/26 11:22:26
It's what he does best (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:15:38
You don't have an original thought? (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:14:28
I dont have time to hold your hands thru what is already
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:19:20
There is no proof of intent
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:23:38
Id argue there is. The same question as before:
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:28:02
You apparently have no idea what intent means (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:29:14
His intent is to quell the investigation..... which is
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:30:23
You have no proof of that
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:31:40
IMO let a jury decide. There is no viable alternative motive
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:35:01
That makes zero sense (nm)
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:00:16
Well, it actually does.(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:03:57
Mueller couldn't find sufficient evidence
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 12:12:09
Yes, take it to Congress.(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 12:16:32
How do you jump from a jury
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 15:04:06
Your inability to think even a single step forward suggests
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 16:04:36
Do you disagree with this, Sal?(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:52:15
Lol god damn you're a total ****ing shill(nm)
-
MrBlueSky
MU
-
4/26 11:24:57
Provide the evidence
-
Sal
KC
-
4/26 11:27:49
on a side note Sal, going to P"ville Beerfest tomorrow if
-
blake1771
KC
-
4/26 11:16:35
Yes.(nm)
-
Badird
MU
-
4/26 11:06:21