Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

congress can’t just swap duties with other branches

Posted on: February 15, 2019 at 13:04:00 CT
El-ahrairah BAMA
Posts:
50427
Member For:
22.24 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
They’ve done the same thing with war powers and it has led to the disastrous failures in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Korea
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The Wall - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:20:15
     I don't know who has standing to bring a lawsuit - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:25:24
          Don't know if activist judges need a plaintiff. They just - hokie VT - 2/15 12:53:12
               A president circumventing congressional duties would qualify - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/15 12:55:51
                    Oh, you mean like obozo, with his "pen and a phone" - GA Tiger MU - 2/15 13:45:25
                    RE: A president circumventing congressional duties would qualify - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:01:34
                         congress can’t just swap duties with other branches - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/15 13:04:00
                              RE: congress can’t just swap duties with other branches - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:05:06
                                   No they didn’t. Try to acknowledge the point (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:20:15
                                        RE: No they didn’t. Try to acknowledge the point (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:21:53
                                             Ok clearly you can’t have a discussion (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:29:54
                         No it didn’t. There is no constitutional authority to do so(nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:02:49
                              RE: No it didn’t. There is no constitutional authority to do so(nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:04:10
                                   That is incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:10:35
                                        RE: That is incorrect (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:12:48
                    How is this different than the other presidential - hokie VT - 2/15 12:59:12
                         It’s just as unconstitutional as the others (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:01:50
                              RE: It’s just as unconstitutional as the others (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:02:54
                                   Incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:10:50
                                        RE: Incorrect (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:13:16
                                             No. It’s pointless (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:20:33
                                                  RE: No. It’s pointless (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:22:39
                         I didn’t say it was(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/15 13:01:41
                              he’s never going to get it (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:02:16
                                   RE: he’s never going to get it (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:05:43
               RE: Don't know if activist judges need a plaintiff. They just - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:54:57
               as if you’d know one way or the other (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 12:54:35
          That's a scary thought. - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:30:38
               No ****(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/15 12:48:59
                    RE: No ****(nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:56:09
                         What does that irrelevancy have to do with anything? (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 13:03:22
                              RE: What does that irrelevancy have to do with anything? (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 13:06:20
                         Imagine that. Liberal president uses dem congressional - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/15 12:57:13
               I'm sure there is standing to sue once he takes action - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:31:45
                    Where is that in Article II? Thanks (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 12:45:27
                    RE: I'm sure there is standing to sue once he takes action - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:44:13
                    For efficiency's sake, wouldn't it be better to resolve - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:33:19
                         Nevermind I found it. The Supreme Court has limited - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:37:23
                              If that's the standard, this will definitely not be the last - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:51:02
                              link? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 12:39:16
                                   RE: link? (nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:47:21
                                        That doesn’t look like the constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 12:53:23
                                        and in what section does that discuss standing to challenge - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 12:51:54
                                             I'm bringing in independent knowledge of congressional - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 13:04:08
                                                  lol - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 13:21:49
                                             I didn't see anything about staying "within the scope" of - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:59:12
                                             RE: and in what section does that discuss standing to challenge - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:57:32
                              RE: Nevermind I found it. The Supreme Court has limited - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:38:55
               It’s Rags - pickle MU - 2/15 12:31:00
                    lol poor lil fella(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:32:19
          Heil Trump!!! - Role Call MU - 2/15 12:29:28
          US Congress can nullify the declaration(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 2/15 12:27:26
               RE: US Congress can nullify the declaration(nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:34:25
               But they aren't and I'm talking specifically about - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:28:06
          lol (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 12:25:49
               why is that funny? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:26:52
                    "no one has standing to challenge Trump" - TigerJackSwartz MU - 2/15 12:28:13
                         No idiot it's a legitimate legal question - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/15 12:30:55
     That’s not how it works (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 12:24:34
          RE: That’s not how it works (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:26:32
               I'm just a bill.... - Mormad MU - 2/15 12:27:38
                    RE: I'm just a bill.... - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:28:52
                         In today's poliical environment, that 'd be a mini-series(nm) - Mormad MU - 2/15 12:30:08
               Incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 12:26:53
                    RE: Incorrect (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:27:21
                         the bill would have to be constitutional - pickle MU - 2/15 12:28:51
                              RE: the bill would have to be constitutional - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:29:45
                                   No. That is incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 2/15 12:31:27
                                        RE: No. That is incorrect (nm) - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:32:40
                                             a bill/law is unconstitutional regardless - pickle MU - 2/15 12:52:00
                                                  RE: a bill/law is unconstitutional regardless - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:59:45
     Are you claiming that everything Congress chooses to spend - Mormad MU - 2/15 12:23:31
          RE: Are you claiming that everything Congress chooses to spend - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:25:18
               You may have hit on something there..... - Mormad MU - 2/15 12:28:51
                    RE: You may have hit on something there..... - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:31:08
     No - raskolnikov MU - 2/15 12:21:58
          RE: No - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:23:09
     so..by that reasoning - meatiger MU - 2/15 12:21:37
          RE: so..by that reasoning - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:24:25
               It used to be - meatiger MU - 2/15 12:26:35
                    RE: It used to be - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:28:23
               No it doesn’t - pickle MU - 2/15 12:25:17
                    RE: No it doesn’t - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 12:32:13




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard