Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

the problem we had was the person making the accusations.

Posted on: February 2, 2019 at 16:28:40 CT
phrejd STL
Posts:
95710
Member For:
16.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
with a lot of these other situations, it's in everyone's best interest to keep their mouths shut. in this one, she was already screaming from the mountaintops trying to extort money out of anyone with a pocketbook. she had at least some evidence of wrongdoing and she was certainly not on the same side as the AD, so denial wan't really a plausible option. they could attack her character, which i would assume they did, but that at least partially points right back at them for hiring and employing her. refusing to cooperate might help but seems like that's much riskier than doing what they did, which appears to be pointing and putting the blame all on her. and it appears the NCAA agreed with that.

really the only part of this that is off is the punishment. probably should have been something, but not what was handed down.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Curious, many say fight it to the max, which means what? - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 2/2 16:01:52
     fight the penalty - Jeff85 MU - 2/2 22:09:49
     In hindsight, yes to all(nm) - Mizzmi27 MU - 2/2 16:52:53
          In hindsight, do you join the PTL Club- Pay the Lady? - Macgrantt MU - 2/2 17:05:29
     A winning SEC school would have made this go away - ERB KC - 2/2 16:45:59
     Commit the crime, accept the consequences, move on (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 2/2 16:30:49
     RE: Curious, many say fight it to the max, which means what? - bstiger MU - 2/2 16:21:59
     Deny, attack her character, plead the 5th not lie - Macgrantt MU - 2/2 16:19:47
          WADR: that's no longer possible - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 2/2 16:31:47
               You seem to have a btter grasp than Glazier did,you're right - Macgrantt MU - 2/2 16:41:59
          the problem we had was the person making the accusations. - phrejd MU - 2/2 16:28:40
               RE: the problem we had was the person making the accusations. - Macgrantt MU - 2/2 16:38:01
                    Won’t work. Female minority. (nm) - DevilsAdvocate KC - 2/2 18:02:45
          It seems like others do as you say(nm) - DevilsAdvocate KC - 2/2 16:20:29
     You make good points - DevilsAdvocate KC - 2/2 16:12:56
     Good questions, which I can't answer not knowing details. - GA Tiger MU - 2/2 16:05:25
          It's because we are sheep - ERB KC - 2/2 16:49:42
          It seems like we get poor legal representation (nm) - DevilsAdvocate KC - 2/2 16:11:07
               I can't judge that. But do wonder how it is picked. - GA Tiger MU - 2/2 16:13:54
     Did the athletes support her story?(nm) - DevilsAdvocate KC - 2/2 16:04:59
          My understanding is yes -nm - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 2/2 16:05:49
               That put us in a pickle, but she supposively acted on her - DevilsAdvocate KC - 2/2 16:08:17
                    she is a serial convicted fraud. She is as far from - MizzouAstro MU - 2/2 20:01:08
                         She's a wh0re. Okay breaking rules until it blows back - jake_mu MU - 2/3 08:46:36
                    Point is whether the NCAA would consider her trustworthly - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 2/2 16:34:41
                         What we do not know is whether or not any - KC rules MU - 2/2 20:31:18
                         the NCAA did not find her trustworthy at all - MizzouAstro MU - 2/2 20:02:14
     strongly worded letters. they're all the rage (nm) - phrejd MU - 2/2 16:04:06




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard