Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I guess it depends on what he means by "a la Greitens"

Posted on: January 10, 2019 at 14:32:03 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56715
Member For:
18.73 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
it certainly came about because of the Greitens' case - maybe that gave an old bill enough visibility or public push to get through. But you are correct, Greitens' would not have technically violated this particular law. Thus, it does no good in a Greitens' situation.

Wouldn't it seem that the proper charge there is "blackmail"? Although that will offend racial sensibilities, and mail is greatly reduced, so they need to take submissions for a new term.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Revenge porn law a la Eric Greitens already - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:02:07
     Holy fvck. I just looked at the article. I know him - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:06:24
          Is she the one with the restraining order?(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/10 15:08:20
               Can't tell yet. I hadn't heard anything about a restraining - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:13:32
                    He is works with a high school classmate of mine too - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:17:09
     tell me how that relates to Greitens(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:12:59
          The law was passed in Missouri immediately following - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:15:57
               so it relates to him because he signed it. got it(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:22:14
                    No...the bill was proposed as a result of the situation with - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:22:47
                         the situation where there was no revenge porn?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:23:25
                              Technically true - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:27:29
                                   so if the law was passed 2 years prior, it still would have - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:29:04
                                        I guess it depends on what he means by "a la Greitens" - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:32:03
                                             i think threatening to transmit the pics is a violation - gmmm98 MU - 1/10 14:39:47
                                             UnderprivilegedText(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:35:08
                                                  That seems to target the poors.... - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:37:56
                                                       please leave cnk out of this(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:39:32
                                                            yeah!(nm) - cnk ATL - 1/10 14:51:38
     Bad law.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:05:29
          Should there be no penalty for sharing - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:08:02
               If you send nudes, you should always weigh in that others - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:30:29
                    Greitens, and my example below - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:31:09
                         lol, and? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:50:00
                         So? No physical harm or property damage was done. It - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:32:36
                              So there is never a victim unless it's physical harm? - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:35:01
                                   Is it criminal if I tell you a secret and you share that wit - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:38:14
                                        Buddy Code Violation right there, TigerM - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:40:04
                                   Cutting in line creates a victim - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:35:57
                                        For someone who loves to call out red herrings - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:36:41
                                             your lack of understanding of fallacies and logic is - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:50:41
                                             What if I am cheating on my wife. I send a screenshot of - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:42:33
                                                  So intent based? - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:45:10
                                                       are you lqf2b8's best man?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:52:25
                                                       The action is the same. Non-consensual sharing of something - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:48:12
                                                            Apparently, it can be now - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:51:11
                                                                 No doubt the guy is a d-bag. But let's not throw around the - ummmm MU - 1/10 15:08:59
                                                                 the discussion isn't about whether he's a d-bag (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:54:46
                                                                      Armchair jailing of people is another really bad part of - ummmm MU - 1/10 15:12:01
                                                                           How has he been armchair jailed? - Mormad MU - 1/10 15:18:03
                                                                                When people sit around and go: - ummmm MU - 1/10 15:22:13
                                                  Again...a conversation between lovers - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:43:26
                                                       Why? It is the same principle. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:46:15
                                                            Disagree (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:47:42
                                                                 Lol, why? gods below you're daft (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:51:09
                                                       You're not that far off from that. - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:46:00
                                                            A naked photo is not the same as a text conversation - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:47:35
                                                                 And if you publically shared a text I sent you that I am gay - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 14:50:07
                                                                 More arbitrariness. By the way, what kind of criminal - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:49:50
                                                                      This law is specifically written to address non-consensual - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:53:15
                                                                           What if it's "art"? - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:55:20
                                                                                What if I am in the picture and Photoshop her face blurry - TigerMatt STL - 1/10 15:00:17
                                                                                     Hmmm, I'd surmise that you're ok in that situation - Mormad MU - 1/10 15:03:15
                                                                           Do you think it should call for jail time? (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:53:44
                                                                 what if mistress said "tonight" with a nude selfie in the - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:48:34
                                             I was demonstrating an example where there are victims - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:37:45
                                                  Cutting in line is far different from sharing personal - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:41:53
                                                       he's trying to get you to understand that you can't - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:52:37
                                                       The problem is the arbitrariness to lines - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:45:03
               Probably not a criminal penalty - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:24:55
                    An individual took naked photos of a significant other - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:28:08
                         No criminal penalty. Invasion of privacy, possibly. - ummmm MU - 1/10 14:33:12
                         aren't there already invasion of privacy laws?(nm) - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:29:52
                              The specific law here speaks to the non-consensual - MrBlueSky MU - 1/10 14:30:31
                                   Otherwise it's just pron(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/10 14:33:21
                                   was the current invasion of privacy law insufficient to - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:32:44
                                        it's like "hate crime" - a law exists against the infringeme - 90Tiger MU - 1/10 14:54:16
               what if somebody said that somebody said that they have - dangertim MU - 1/10 14:13:38




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard